Mark Zuckerberg

But in a game, it's almost just fun.

And even in the lobby of a game, it's not even bearing on the game.

It's just kind of like a funny...

sort of humorous thing to do.

So it's like, is that problematic?

I don't think so, because fundamentally, you're not causing harm in that world.

So I think that the...

part of the question that I think we need to figure out is what are the ways where things could have been harmful in the physical world that we will now be freed from that.

And therefore there should be fewer restrictions in the digital world.

And then there might be new ways in which there could be harm in the digital world that there weren't the case before.

So there's more anonymity, right?

It's, you know, when you, when you show up to a,

you know, a restaurant or something, it's like all the norms where you pay the bill at the end.

It's because, you know, you, you, you have one identity and, you know, the, you know, if you, if you stiff them, then like, you know, life is a repeat game and that's not going to work out well for you.

But, you know, in a digital world where you can be anonymous and show up in different ways, um, I think the incentive to act like a good citizen can be a lot less and that causes a lot of issues and toxic behavior.

So that needs to get sorted out.

Um,

So I think in terms of what is allowed, I think you want to just look at what are the damages.

But then there's also other things that are not related to kind of harm, less about what should be allowed and more about what will be possible that are more about the laws of physics, right?

It's like if you wanted to travel to see me in person, you'd have to get on a plane and that would take a few hours to get here.