Mark Zuckerberg

that they don't want something on the service.

And I think we have a bunch of principles around how we deal with that.

Because on the one hand, if there's a democratically elected government and people around the world just have different values and different places, then should we as a California-based company

tell them that something that they have decided is unacceptable actually like

that we need to be able to, to, to, to express that.

I mean, I think that that's, there's a certain amount of, of hubris in that.

But then I think that there are other cases where, you know, it's, it's like a little more autocratic and, you know, you have the dictator leader who's just trying to crack down on dissent and, you know, the people in a country are really not aligned with that.

And it's not necessarily against their culture, but it's,

Um, but the, the, the person who's, who's leading it is, is just trying to push in a certain direction.

Um, these are very complex questions.

Uh, but I, I think, so it's, it's difficult to have, have a one size fits all, um, approach to it.

But in general, we're, we're pretty active in, in kind of advocating and pushing back on, on, um, requests to take things down.

Um,

But honestly, I think a request to censor things is one thing, and that's obviously bad.

But where we draw a much harder line is on requests for access to information.

Because if you get told that you can't say something, that's bad.

Obviously, it violates your...

sense and freedom of expression at some level, but a government getting access to data in a way that

seems like it would be unlawful in our country, exposes people to real physical harm.

And that's something that in general we take very seriously.