Mark Zuckerberg

Yeah, and that's why that side of things, the kind of governments running these broad manipulation campaigns, I mean, we're not letting off the gas on that at all. I think most categories of bad stuff that we're policing, everyone agrees is bad. No one's sitting there defending that terrorism is good or child exploitation or drugs or IP violations or people inciting violence.

Yeah, and that's why that side of things, the kind of governments running these broad manipulation campaigns, I mean, we're not letting off the gas on that at all. I think most categories of bad stuff that we're policing, everyone agrees is bad. No one's sitting there defending that terrorism is good or child exploitation or drugs or IP violations or people inciting violence.

Yeah, and that's why that side of things, the kind of governments running these broad manipulation campaigns, I mean, we're not letting off the gas on that at all. I think most categories of bad stuff that we're policing, everyone agrees is bad. No one's sitting there defending that terrorism is good or child exploitation or drugs or IP violations or people inciting violence.

It's like most of the stuff is bad. People clearly believe that... that election interference and foreign government manipulation of content is bad. This is the type of stuff that the vast majority of our energy goes towards that, and we're not changing our approach on any of that. The two categories

It's like most of the stuff is bad. People clearly believe that... that election interference and foreign government manipulation of content is bad. This is the type of stuff that the vast majority of our energy goes towards that, and we're not changing our approach on any of that. The two categories

It's like most of the stuff is bad. People clearly believe that... that election interference and foreign government manipulation of content is bad. This is the type of stuff that the vast majority of our energy goes towards that, and we're not changing our approach on any of that. The two categories

that I think have been very politicized are misinformation, because who gets to judge what's false and what's true? You may just not like my opinion on something, and then people think it's false, but I think that that one's really tricky. And the other one is basically what people refer to as hate speech.

that I think have been very politicized are misinformation, because who gets to judge what's false and what's true? You may just not like my opinion on something, and then people think it's false, but I think that that one's really tricky. And the other one is basically what people refer to as hate speech.

that I think have been very politicized are misinformation, because who gets to judge what's false and what's true? You may just not like my opinion on something, and then people think it's false, but I think that that one's really tricky. And the other one is basically what people refer to as hate speech.

which I think also comes from a good place of wanting to crack down on that, of wanting to promote more inclusion and belonging and people feeling good and having a pluralistic society that can... that can basically have all these different communities coexist.

which I think also comes from a good place of wanting to crack down on that, of wanting to promote more inclusion and belonging and people feeling good and having a pluralistic society that can... that can basically have all these different communities coexist.

which I think also comes from a good place of wanting to crack down on that, of wanting to promote more inclusion and belonging and people feeling good and having a pluralistic society that can... that can basically have all these different communities coexist.

But I think the problem is that all these things are on a spectrum, and when you go too far on them, I think on that side, we just basically got to this point where... there were these things that you just couldn't say, which were mainstream discourse, right? So it's like Pete Hegseth is going to probably be defending his nomination for Secretary of Defense on the Senate floor.

But I think the problem is that all these things are on a spectrum, and when you go too far on them, I think on that side, we just basically got to this point where... there were these things that you just couldn't say, which were mainstream discourse, right? So it's like Pete Hegseth is going to probably be defending his nomination for Secretary of Defense on the Senate floor.

But I think the problem is that all these things are on a spectrum, and when you go too far on them, I think on that side, we just basically got to this point where... there were these things that you just couldn't say, which were mainstream discourse, right? So it's like Pete Hegseth is going to probably be defending his nomination for Secretary of Defense on the Senate floor.

And I think one of the points that he's made is that he thinks that women shouldn't be able to be in certain combat roles. And until we updated our policies, that wouldn't have been a thing that you could have said on our platforms because it would call for the exclusion of a protected category of people. And- So and it's like, OK, like on its on its face. Yeah.

And I think one of the points that he's made is that he thinks that women shouldn't be able to be in certain combat roles. And until we updated our policies, that wouldn't have been a thing that you could have said on our platforms because it would call for the exclusion of a protected category of people. And- So and it's like, OK, like on its on its face. Yeah.

And I think one of the points that he's made is that he thinks that women shouldn't be able to be in certain combat roles. And until we updated our policies, that wouldn't have been a thing that you could have said on our platforms because it would call for the exclusion of a protected category of people. And- So and it's like, OK, like on its on its face. Yeah.

Calling for the exclusion of a protected category. That seems like that's OK. There's like legal protections. There's all the stuff. But, OK, if it's like OK to say on the floor of Congress, you should probably be able to debate it on social media. So so I think some of the stuff I think well-intentioned went too far, needs to just get rationalized a bit.

Calling for the exclusion of a protected category. That seems like that's OK. There's like legal protections. There's all the stuff. But, OK, if it's like OK to say on the floor of Congress, you should probably be able to debate it on social media. So so I think some of the stuff I think well-intentioned went too far, needs to just get rationalized a bit.