Marshall Harris

Confirm that the report cards are neither reliable nor scientifically valid.

In fact, these ambitions explain the union's ongoing and steadfast refusal to share any data or information about the process that it inaccurately tries to characterize as scientifically valid.

Scientifically valid was in quotes.

Given these significant admitted limitations, we continue to recommend that clubs prioritize feedback and information provided directly by their own players rather than relying on the NFLPA's agenda-driven exercise.

We further recommend that clubs refrain from commentating or engaging publicly on the alleged survey and report card results.

Doing so only provides credibility to the union's media campaign.

We will review the developments in light of the arbitrator's decision.

If you have any questions, please contact.

And they gave three people's names.

Look,

It's just we're a players union.

We want to know how our union members feel about their employers, of which we are binded to by the union agreements.

We are the weakest union among all professional sports because we have the fewest games and the careers are the shortest, relatively speaking.

And we just want to know how everybody's doing because that time matters.

NFL, not only is this not something that we want to show the results of, but we want to make sure that the public doesn't know how teams treat their players and how teams treat their players' families.

Hilarious.

Why would you care unless you have something to hide?

It means something because if they find out who this is, they're subject to, I think, some sort of result here, like some sort of legal financial punishment.

Maybe I don't know necessarily what the punishment is agreed to that's upon this, but there might actually be some sort of consequence.

How would they find out?