Mary Margaret Olihan

It's a framework, so I can't get ahead of their negotiations, but my understanding is that we will be able to do anything, anywhere, that we will lock up the mineral rights there.

Russia and China are out, including drilling for energy.

I'm sure that we'll have to impose...

a kind of access to the energy if we want to drill, because there's a lot of oil up there that the Greenlanders have signed on to the Green New Deal kind of ideas with the UN sustainable goals.

So they wear the little round pin, you know the round pin with the colors that's like a demonic pin of how they're going to have global communism.

The UN agenda 30 now goals.

But we will be able to have US sovereignty on those bases like any base around the world.

Some of the stumbling blocks will be to make sure that we don't have to consult with both the Greenlanders and the Danes as we do stuff.

It takes too much time.

We're now living in a world that moves very quickly, especially our adversaries.

They don't have to go through trial.

Yes.

And I'm not sure what they're going to call it, Vince.

We'll see if this is a COFA or what this is, which is a free association pact like we have

with Palau and Micronesia.

I'm just not sure.

But it sounds like he's, and I'm not getting ahead of the president, but it does sound like he's letting the Danes say face and still say that it's Danish territory.

I think so.

Because that makes them an Arctic player, even though they can't afford to develop it or defend it and never have been able to.

They just don't have the interest or the capacity.