Matt Beall

I haven't researched it enough to have a conclusion on it, and that probably tells you something about how likely I think that it is that this is anything at all other than a misinterpretation of data or a mistake somewhere. Um, I know, and, but I, I do know that people are going to look into this and are going to find out whether or not this is true.

So I'm open to it being a possibility that, but I mean, two kilometers down, that is, that is like, that's some serious work when you're talking about going that far underground with a structure. Um, it would be absolutely Eiffel towers deep. Okay, yeah. Yeah, I've heard up to two kilometers deep, which is more than an Eiffel Tower. Yeah, I think it's unlikely.

So I'm open to it being a possibility that, but I mean, two kilometers down, that is, that is like, that's some serious work when you're talking about going that far underground with a structure. Um, it would be absolutely Eiffel towers deep. Okay, yeah. Yeah, I've heard up to two kilometers deep, which is more than an Eiffel Tower. Yeah, I think it's unlikely.

So I'm open to it being a possibility that, but I mean, two kilometers down, that is, that is like, that's some serious work when you're talking about going that far underground with a structure. Um, it would be absolutely Eiffel towers deep. Okay, yeah. Yeah, I've heard up to two kilometers deep, which is more than an Eiffel Tower. Yeah, I think it's unlikely.

Ryan, can you pull up, I just sent you an email from Chris Dunn, and maybe we can just look at that real quick. That might be fun. You want to read this? You're a good reader.

Ryan, can you pull up, I just sent you an email from Chris Dunn, and maybe we can just look at that real quick. That might be fun. You want to read this? You're a good reader.

Ryan, can you pull up, I just sent you an email from Chris Dunn, and maybe we can just look at that real quick. That might be fun. You want to read this? You're a good reader.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah.

There's a lot of stuff at the end that's not necessary. I should say at the outset of Freund's research was not even remotely inspired by the pyramids. Neither has he given any indication in his writing or in... private conversations that he had even considered that he may have possibly discovered the answer to solving future environment and energy production problems.

There's a lot of stuff at the end that's not necessary. I should say at the outset of Freund's research was not even remotely inspired by the pyramids. Neither has he given any indication in his writing or in... private conversations that he had even considered that he may have possibly discovered the answer to solving future environment and energy production problems.

There's a lot of stuff at the end that's not necessary. I should say at the outset of Freund's research was not even remotely inspired by the pyramids. Neither has he given any indication in his writing or in... private conversations that he had even considered that he may have possibly discovered the answer to solving future environment and energy production problems.

I made that connection and saw his research as significant in resolving the questions and doubts about whether physioelectricity output from stressing granite in the Great Pyramids King Chamber could be a factor in producing a significant amount of energy.

I made that connection and saw his research as significant in resolving the questions and doubts about whether physioelectricity output from stressing granite in the Great Pyramids King Chamber could be a factor in producing a significant amount of energy.

I made that connection and saw his research as significant in resolving the questions and doubts about whether physioelectricity output from stressing granite in the Great Pyramids King Chamber could be a factor in producing a significant amount of energy.

Considering the level of science knowledge and experience of those involved in the ScanPyramid project, I'm not qualified to judge any of their findings. Similarly, I'm not qualified to judge the findings of the SAR scanning team.

Considering the level of science knowledge and experience of those involved in the ScanPyramid project, I'm not qualified to judge any of their findings. Similarly, I'm not qualified to judge the findings of the SAR scanning team.

Considering the level of science knowledge and experience of those involved in the ScanPyramid project, I'm not qualified to judge any of their findings. Similarly, I'm not qualified to judge the findings of the SAR scanning team.

However, I would love to know how the geometrically accurate CAD drawings were extended out of the raw data because they seem to represent a massive Tesla-like electromagnetic earthquake machine. But even without the CAD, I believe there is enough in the scans to warrant further investigation.