Matt Boyle

And then the real fight is about the census in 2030 and whether or not noncitizens will continue to be counted.

and the apportionment of congressional districts.

Yeah, well, speaking of Ramdami and the rich thing, I mean, did you see this amazing moment where Governor Hochul was campaigning with them and the crowd at the rally was chanting tax the rich and Governor Hochul came out afterwards and thought she thought they were chanting go.

No bills is what she claimed.

It's not.

They were chanting tax the rich.

Well, that's their people.

Right.

Like and we have their numbers now to prove it.

So this is an analysis that a Republican lobbying firm, CGCN, produced.

They gave it to us exclusively before it was publicly released.

It's called Class Dismissed 2.

It's based off a previous analysis that they did a couple of years ago.

that was similar, where they went through all 435 congressional districts around the country, and they ranked the top 30 and the bottom 30 in terms of median income.

So the higher income in the top 30 districts are ones that are around $135,000 annual income for an individual earner.

In the in the top 30 congressional districts in terms of wealth in the country of those top 30 congressional districts now, 23 of them or 76 more than 76 percent are represented by Democrats.

They include some of the names we just talked about there, like Jamie Raskin, like an Eric Swalwell, like a Jamie – we just said Jamie Raskin, like a Nancy Pelosi, like Ro Khanna, who's thinking about running for president, et cetera, like Jerry Nadler from New York City.

So what we see is the wealth is concentrated in the area –

areas that vote for Democrats.

In addition to that, we see that an analysis of the last three presidential elections, where Donald Trump has been the Republican candidate, shows that nearly two thirds or sometimes even as high as three quarters