Matt Grimm

We kind of subscribe to the Brian Armstrong, Coinbase kind of philosophy of we're here for a mission, and our mission at Anderle is to bring the best technology to the defense sector, period, regardless of who's in the White House, regardless of what party is in control of Congress. So for us internally, it doesn't really matter to the day-to-day life.

But externally, of course, perceptions are what they are. So yeah, we have to play the political game and influence where we can.

But externally, of course, perceptions are what they are. So yeah, we have to play the political game and influence where we can.

But externally, of course, perceptions are what they are. So yeah, we have to play the political game and influence where we can.

Better, I think, is doing a lot of work in that line. I think we were going to succeed under either. Like we've succeeded under President Biden. We succeeded under President Trump before that. So I don't think there's a massive difference to Andrew. Mostly what we're excited about in a new administration is

Better, I think, is doing a lot of work in that line. I think we were going to succeed under either. Like we've succeeded under President Biden. We succeeded under President Trump before that. So I don't think there's a massive difference to Andrew. Mostly what we're excited about in a new administration is

Better, I think, is doing a lot of work in that line. I think we were going to succeed under either. Like we've succeeded under President Biden. We succeeded under President Trump before that. So I don't think there's a massive difference to Andrew. Mostly what we're excited about in a new administration is

are new appointees who bring different mindsets to defense procurement, like a different kind of approach, a recognition that the status quo is not acceptable, a new approach to funding, a new approach to contracting, seeing more urgency, more ambition, kind of the return of capitalism to the defense sector, which has been sorely missing for decades.

are new appointees who bring different mindsets to defense procurement, like a different kind of approach, a recognition that the status quo is not acceptable, a new approach to funding, a new approach to contracting, seeing more urgency, more ambition, kind of the return of capitalism to the defense sector, which has been sorely missing for decades.

are new appointees who bring different mindsets to defense procurement, like a different kind of approach, a recognition that the status quo is not acceptable, a new approach to funding, a new approach to contracting, seeing more urgency, more ambition, kind of the return of capitalism to the defense sector, which has been sorely missing for decades.

A rebuilding the American industrial base, relying on cost plus contracts less and turning to more firm fixed contracts, a whole number of different policy approaches that were pretty optimistic that a new administration is going to at least take some of that and put into practice.

A rebuilding the American industrial base, relying on cost plus contracts less and turning to more firm fixed contracts, a whole number of different policy approaches that were pretty optimistic that a new administration is going to at least take some of that and put into practice.

A rebuilding the American industrial base, relying on cost plus contracts less and turning to more firm fixed contracts, a whole number of different policy approaches that were pretty optimistic that a new administration is going to at least take some of that and put into practice.

What we would like to see happen is a recognition of and an acknowledgement of what we see as a pretty obvious and emerging conflict around freedom, around democracy, around the rights of citizens to have free speech, free assembly, and to have their voices heard in their own government. A philosophy that I would say does not apply to mainland China or to Russia for that matter as well.

What we would like to see happen is a recognition of and an acknowledgement of what we see as a pretty obvious and emerging conflict around freedom, around democracy, around the rights of citizens to have free speech, free assembly, and to have their voices heard in their own government. A philosophy that I would say does not apply to mainland China or to Russia for that matter as well.

What we would like to see happen is a recognition of and an acknowledgement of what we see as a pretty obvious and emerging conflict around freedom, around democracy, around the rights of citizens to have free speech, free assembly, and to have their voices heard in their own government. A philosophy that I would say does not apply to mainland China or to Russia for that matter as well.

So I think a new approach to seeing the emerging threat that's there and then reflecting on kind of the capitalistic and industrial base that relies on China right now and taking an approach that brings a lot of those jobs, a lot of that industry, a lot of that kind of tier two, tier three, lower down in the supply chain types of work back to America and our allies, because I think depending on China in the long run is kind of a dicey position to be.

So I think a new approach to seeing the emerging threat that's there and then reflecting on kind of the capitalistic and industrial base that relies on China right now and taking an approach that brings a lot of those jobs, a lot of that industry, a lot of that kind of tier two, tier three, lower down in the supply chain types of work back to America and our allies, because I think depending on China in the long run is kind of a dicey position to be.

So I think a new approach to seeing the emerging threat that's there and then reflecting on kind of the capitalistic and industrial base that relies on China right now and taking an approach that brings a lot of those jobs, a lot of that industry, a lot of that kind of tier two, tier three, lower down in the supply chain types of work back to America and our allies, because I think depending on China in the long run is kind of a dicey position to be.

Do you think China will invade Taiwan? If America does its job and the West and our allies do their jobs, I think no. I think the ambition is there. I think the vision is there. I mean, I was personally sanctioned by China for selling missiles to Taiwan, as was my co-founder, Brian Schimpf.