Matt Walsh

We're calling on the court to ensure Mr. Anthony's constitutional rights are fully protected.

Now, there's a few very important things to understand here.

Just as a preliminary matter, some of these potential black jury members were obviously unqualified, as I just mentioned.

One of them even said that he would never put a brother behind bars.

So he said the quiet part out loud.

Obviously, he can't be on the jury.

Watch.

So this was a highly dysfunctional process, but not for the reasons that Carmelo Anthony's lawyers are suggesting.

Think about how revealing this is.

The defense team wanted to know the jury's opinion on open borders.

Now, there's only one reason to ask that question in the context of this case, which obviously has nothing to do with open borders.

They want Democrats on the jury.

That's it.

They're using the immigration question as a proxy to figure out the political affiliation of the jurors.

And the defense team is doing that because they understand that Democrats are the party of social unrest and revolutionary activism and anti-white racism.

Democrats are lockstep in everything they do.

They want to promote the narrative that whites are the oppressor and blacks are the victims.

And in this case, that means they'd vote to acquit for obvious reasons.

As for the black juror who openly admitted that he wouldn't put a black defendant in prison, at least he was honest.

The typical black juror who's racially biased doesn't go around admitting it.