Matt Welch

Well, again, I live in this case in Brooklyn, New York, so I can vote and I do very vociferously as much as I can. I even sometimes talk locally, even sometimes at those types of meetings. And my vote doesn't really move the needle on anything because Democrats are 95 percent of my neighborhood. But I vote and I try and I do I do whatever I do.

Well, again, I live in this case in Brooklyn, New York, so I can vote and I do very vociferously as much as I can. I even sometimes talk locally, even sometimes at those types of meetings. And my vote doesn't really move the needle on anything because Democrats are 95 percent of my neighborhood. But I vote and I try and I do I do whatever I do.

Well, again, I live in this case in Brooklyn, New York, so I can vote and I do very vociferously as much as I can. I even sometimes talk locally, even sometimes at those types of meetings. And my vote doesn't really move the needle on anything because Democrats are 95 percent of my neighborhood. But I vote and I try and I do I do whatever I do.

But I'm not a member of a party and I don't think that it is right. I think it's perfectly fine to not be a member of a party, to not have a natural inclination to join one, to sit on your hands while your own party does things that are against your deeply held beliefs, which a lot of people who work in professional politics do.

But I'm not a member of a party and I don't think that it is right. I think it's perfectly fine to not be a member of a party, to not have a natural inclination to join one, to sit on your hands while your own party does things that are against your deeply held beliefs, which a lot of people who work in professional politics do.

But I'm not a member of a party and I don't think that it is right. I think it's perfectly fine to not be a member of a party, to not have a natural inclination to join one, to sit on your hands while your own party does things that are against your deeply held beliefs, which a lot of people who work in professional politics do.

Oftentimes, people who worked in Republican politics for a long time sat on their hands when there was the gay marriage debate that Sarah Longwell was talking about earlier, that they just sort of, even though they wanted this to happen, we're not gonna talk about it. I wanna avoid that. I want to reason it's been in favor of gay marriage since it has existed in 1968.

Oftentimes, people who worked in Republican politics for a long time sat on their hands when there was the gay marriage debate that Sarah Longwell was talking about earlier, that they just sort of, even though they wanted this to happen, we're not gonna talk about it. I wanna avoid that. I want to reason it's been in favor of gay marriage since it has existed in 1968.

Oftentimes, people who worked in Republican politics for a long time sat on their hands when there was the gay marriage debate that Sarah Longwell was talking about earlier, that they just sort of, even though they wanted this to happen, we're not gonna talk about it. I wanna avoid that. I want to reason it's been in favor of gay marriage since it has existed in 1968.

I think our first editorial was in 1971 on the issue. I find it more potent to be talking about those ideas and those policies without worrying, without calculating whose team I am on or I am not, And therefore my voice is not going to be silenced for even a little bit. I'm not going to hesitate. I'm going to be happy to talk to people who support those things, happy to criticize people who don't.

I think our first editorial was in 1971 on the issue. I find it more potent to be talking about those ideas and those policies without worrying, without calculating whose team I am on or I am not, And therefore my voice is not going to be silenced for even a little bit. I'm not going to hesitate. I'm going to be happy to talk to people who support those things, happy to criticize people who don't.

I think our first editorial was in 1971 on the issue. I find it more potent to be talking about those ideas and those policies without worrying, without calculating whose team I am on or I am not, And therefore my voice is not going to be silenced for even a little bit. I'm not going to hesitate. I'm going to be happy to talk to people who support those things, happy to criticize people who don't.

And then on the next issue, we'll change teams again. It's not to tell anyone else.

And then on the next issue, we'll change teams again. It's not to tell anyone else.

And then on the next issue, we'll change teams again. It's not to tell anyone else.

I reject the premise of your question. I'm, first of all, not smart. And second of all, I wanted Harris to win, even though I didn't vote for her. Yeah.

I reject the premise of your question. I'm, first of all, not smart. And second of all, I wanted Harris to win, even though I didn't vote for her. Yeah.

I reject the premise of your question. I'm, first of all, not smart. And second of all, I wanted Harris to win, even though I didn't vote for her. Yeah.

How about if in Nevada, none of the above had won, right? Because that's on the ballot.

How about if in Nevada, none of the above had won, right? Because that's on the ballot.