Matt

You need sin to get black.

You need sin to get black.

Big Bear? Where is Big Bear? California. Alright. I'm certainly willing to take a look at it. That's unfortunate.

Big Bear? Where is Big Bear? California. Alright. I'm certainly willing to take a look at it. That's unfortunate.

That was it. There's no more meat stick for you.

That was it. There's no more meat stick for you.

No, but we will because we have to. The one I was going to bring up and probably the one I would think he had in mind is Robert Shock. Okay. Who actually does have, I don't know exactly what his, yeah, he has a PhD from Yale. American associate professor of natural is an American associate professor of natural sciences at the College of General Studies at Boston University. Currently employed.

No, but we will because we have to. The one I was going to bring up and probably the one I would think he had in mind is Robert Shock. Okay. Who actually does have, I don't know exactly what his, yeah, he has a PhD from Yale. American associate professor of natural is an American associate professor of natural sciences at the College of General Studies at Boston University. Currently employed.

He's the guy who says that the Sphinx is older than we think and that it's eroded.

He's the guy who says that the Sphinx is older than we think and that it's eroded.

That I think he believes it was like water erosion instead of sand erosion.

That I think he believes it was like water erosion instead of sand erosion.

But yeah, that it's basically, this is a very old structure that used to be bigger, that, you know, if you look at the head, the head doesn't match the proportions of the rest of the body. And I've seen archaeologists after archaeologists mock this. And I'm not saying nobody's ever presented a counter-argument to it. I just haven't seen one.

But yeah, that it's basically, this is a very old structure that used to be bigger, that, you know, if you look at the head, the head doesn't match the proportions of the rest of the body. And I've seen archaeologists after archaeologists mock this. And I'm not saying nobody's ever presented a counter-argument to it. I just haven't seen one.

I would love, and this is why it drives me insane that I can't get Milo on the phone. I would love for him to come on and explain, like, why is this fringe?

I would love, and this is why it drives me insane that I can't get Milo on the phone. I would love for him to come on and explain, like, why is this fringe?

Because every time I see it, I'm like, okay, well, yeah, sand erosion and water erosion would look similar. So there's just the erosion alone isn't enough.

Because every time I see it, I'm like, okay, well, yeah, sand erosion and water erosion would look similar. So there's just the erosion alone isn't enough.

On the other hand, I have yet to see an explanation of why he has to be wrong other than it doesn't track with current Egyptology. And Egyptology is a weird field. Egyptology, compared to everything else, you're not allowed to question it. Egyptologists are really intense.

On the other hand, I have yet to see an explanation of why he has to be wrong other than it doesn't track with current Egyptology. And Egyptology is a weird field. Egyptology, compared to everything else, you're not allowed to question it. Egyptologists are really intense.