Matthew Kachuk

I mean, the thing is, is that could be the plan.

Everybody wants to sit there and say that the plan has to go all the way through completion of the Iranian people taking back their country.

Um,

One is the United States has never been good about changing dictatorships.

We've failed at it so many times, whether it be through direct military action or through the CIA.

What has to happen is it has to come from the people within Iran.

And they're the ones that have to decide if they're going to take their country back.

What we have to look at is how do we protect Iran?

America, our soldiers, our allies that are in the region.

And we have to do that by eliminating their capability of bringing offensive action to us.

And that's really what this is about right now is is limiting their ability to to do that to us and holding us hostage to a nuclear weapon.

Well, if you look in, um, immediately after we destroyed their capabilities or the capabilities that they had, there was a onslaught of Chinese, um,

Moving into and bringing in more technology for them to utilize.

And we define the threat and everybody keeps talking about the threat being an ICBM because we're sold on this idea that that's a big threat.

I mean, we got to look at Russia or not Russia, but Korea.

North Korea has ICBMs.

But do we worry about them?

Why don't we worry about them as much as we do about Iran?

And it's because they have a more stable and not such a radical environment.

They are looking at protecting themselves and using it as a deterrent.