Matthias Endler

You mentioned it before, but that seems to be a bit of the secret sauce in there because apparently, and correct me if I'm wrong here, Other editors are not built this way. They don't work on this level of abstraction, almost like an AST, an abstract syntax tree level of abstraction to modify text. Can you elaborate on this a bit? What is it? And also, do you agree?

You mentioned it before, but that seems to be a bit of the secret sauce in there because apparently, and correct me if I'm wrong here, Other editors are not built this way. They don't work on this level of abstraction, almost like an AST, an abstract syntax tree level of abstraction to modify text. Can you elaborate on this a bit? What is it? And also, do you agree?

You mentioned it before, but that seems to be a bit of the secret sauce in there because apparently, and correct me if I'm wrong here, Other editors are not built this way. They don't work on this level of abstraction, almost like an AST, an abstract syntax tree level of abstraction to modify text. Can you elaborate on this a bit? What is it? And also, do you agree?

Is that really critical central part of that?

Is that really critical central part of that?

Is that really critical central part of that?

And how does TreeSitter work on a type level? Is it like an intermediate representation where you map certain keywords in different languages to the same keyword in TreeSitter?

And how does TreeSitter work on a type level? Is it like an intermediate representation where you map certain keywords in different languages to the same keyword in TreeSitter?

And how does TreeSitter work on a type level? Is it like an intermediate representation where you map certain keywords in different languages to the same keyword in TreeSitter?

That's a very smart move. Where does the name TreeSitter come from? Is that because it's almost a recursive structure where you can think of it as a tree inside a tree inside a tree where you have different levels of abstraction that you can iterate on? Or does it come from the abstract syntax tree?

That's a very smart move. Where does the name TreeSitter come from? Is that because it's almost a recursive structure where you can think of it as a tree inside a tree inside a tree where you have different levels of abstraction that you can iterate on? Or does it come from the abstract syntax tree?

That's a very smart move. Where does the name TreeSitter come from? Is that because it's almost a recursive structure where you can think of it as a tree inside a tree inside a tree where you have different levels of abstraction that you can iterate on? Or does it come from the abstract syntax tree?

It's sort of library where you can modify code based on certain, I would even say like a grammar or something where you can say, I want to do a code modification and I give it an expression and then it figures out what to do based on this expression. It's,

It's sort of library where you can modify code based on certain, I would even say like a grammar or something where you can say, I want to do a code modification and I give it an expression and then it figures out what to do based on this expression. It's,

It's sort of library where you can modify code based on certain, I would even say like a grammar or something where you can say, I want to do a code modification and I give it an expression and then it figures out what to do based on this expression. It's,

more high level than a regular expression it's also more powerful i would say can you do certain things like this in z as well on a syntax level i know it's not exposed to the user but internally could you do such modifications

more high level than a regular expression it's also more powerful i would say can you do certain things like this in z as well on a syntax level i know it's not exposed to the user but internally could you do such modifications

more high level than a regular expression it's also more powerful i would say can you do certain things like this in z as well on a syntax level i know it's not exposed to the user but internally could you do such modifications

Every day I get an update, which is nice because they work flawlessly and they work every single time. And I find myself reading the change log a lot because the change log is nicely formatted. You can see what's going on. I wonder how you do these updates. How does the pipeline work to create these updates? How do you push them to the clients? And how do you make it so flawless?

Every day I get an update, which is nice because they work flawlessly and they work every single time. And I find myself reading the change log a lot because the change log is nicely formatted. You can see what's going on. I wonder how you do these updates. How does the pipeline work to create these updates? How do you push them to the clients? And how do you make it so flawless?