Maureen Maher
👤 SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
How that happened, the prosecutor says, is lost to history. But he insists the evidence clearly shows that somehow, some way, four-year-old John Ruelas was there. So you honestly believe that John Ruelas was somehow in the vicinity of Jane Mixer back in 1969? That his blood, it's actually John Ruelas' blood?
How that happened, the prosecutor says, is lost to history. But he insists the evidence clearly shows that somehow, some way, four-year-old John Ruelas was there. So you honestly believe that John Ruelas was somehow in the vicinity of Jane Mixer back in 1969? That his blood, it's actually John Ruelas' blood?
How that happened, the prosecutor says, is lost to history. But he insists the evidence clearly shows that somehow, some way, four-year-old John Ruelas was there. So you honestly believe that John Ruelas was somehow in the vicinity of Jane Mixer back in 1969? That his blood, it's actually John Ruelas' blood?
With Hiller's case hinging on DNA, defense attorney Gabri highlights other evidence that points away from Gary Leiterman.
With Hiller's case hinging on DNA, defense attorney Gabri highlights other evidence that points away from Gary Leiterman.
With Hiller's case hinging on DNA, defense attorney Gabri highlights other evidence that points away from Gary Leiterman.
That's correct. Leiterman's fingerprints do not match any of the prints still unidentified in the case. Nor did Leiterman own a car, anything like the one seen speeding away the night of the crime.
That's correct. Leiterman's fingerprints do not match any of the prints still unidentified in the case. Nor did Leiterman own a car, anything like the one seen speeding away the night of the crime.
That's correct. Leiterman's fingerprints do not match any of the prints still unidentified in the case. Nor did Leiterman own a car, anything like the one seen speeding away the night of the crime.
Leiterman does not take the stand. Two weeks after opening arguments, the jurors begin deliberating. Leiterman's close friend Rachel Kuby says the case against him seems weak.
Leiterman does not take the stand. Two weeks after opening arguments, the jurors begin deliberating. Leiterman's close friend Rachel Kuby says the case against him seems weak.
Leiterman does not take the stand. Two weeks after opening arguments, the jurors begin deliberating. Leiterman's close friend Rachel Kuby says the case against him seems weak.
Still, his family is worried, and even the Mixer family feels sympathy towards them.
Still, his family is worried, and even the Mixer family feels sympathy towards them.
Still, his family is worried, and even the Mixer family feels sympathy towards them.
Even so, Barbara and Maggie have come to believe that the state has proved its case. What do you think, then, is the most incriminating piece of evidence? It's got to be the DNA. But has the state won over the jury? Gary Leiterman's fate is in their hands.
Even so, Barbara and Maggie have come to believe that the state has proved its case. What do you think, then, is the most incriminating piece of evidence? It's got to be the DNA. But has the state won over the jury? Gary Leiterman's fate is in their hands.