Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Pricing

Meghan McCarty Carino

👤 Speaker
23 total appearances

Appearances Over Time

Podcast Appearances

Marketplace All-in-One
3D printing was supposed to disrupt prosthetic costs. It hasn’t.

It's been a decade since 3D printing came to the prosthetics industry, and it still hasn't brought costs down.

Marketplace All-in-One
3D printing was supposed to disrupt prosthetic costs. It hasn’t.

From American Public Media, this is Marketplace Tech.

Marketplace All-in-One
3D printing was supposed to disrupt prosthetic costs. It hasn’t.

I'm Megan McCarty Carino.

Marketplace All-in-One
3D printing was supposed to disrupt prosthetic costs. It hasn’t.

Prosthetic limbs can be pricey, costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Marketplace All-in-One
3D printing was supposed to disrupt prosthetic costs. It hasn’t.

So the industry seemed ripe for disruption when 3D printing came along.

Marketplace All-in-One
3D printing was supposed to disrupt prosthetic costs. It hasn’t.

The technology requires little labor and uses economical materials.

Marketplace All-in-One
3D printing was supposed to disrupt prosthetic costs. It hasn’t.

But the reality of 3D printing prosthetic limbs isn't that straightforward, according to writer Britt Young, who uses a prosthetic arm and wrote about this recently for IEE Spectrum magazine.

Marketplace All-in-One
3D printing was supposed to disrupt prosthetic costs. It hasn’t.

One of the factors that you describe as being a barrier to reducing cost actually has nothing to do with the actual devices, but how insurance is covering them.

Marketplace All-in-One
3D printing was supposed to disrupt prosthetic costs. It hasn’t.

Can you tell me more about that?

Marketplace All-in-One
3D printing was supposed to disrupt prosthetic costs. It hasn’t.

And was that a 3D printed attachment?

Marketplace All-in-One
3D printing was supposed to disrupt prosthetic costs. It hasn’t.

Or do you have any experience kind of navigating this specific 3D prosthetic market?

Marketplace All-in-One
3D printing was supposed to disrupt prosthetic costs. It hasn’t.

We'll be right back.

Marketplace All-in-One
3D printing was supposed to disrupt prosthetic costs. It hasn’t.

You are listening to Marketplace Tech.

Marketplace All-in-One
3D printing was supposed to disrupt prosthetic costs. It hasn’t.

I'm Megan McCarty Carino.

Marketplace All-in-One
3D printing was supposed to disrupt prosthetic costs. It hasn’t.

We're back with writer and UC Berkeley lecturer Britt Young.

Marketplace All-in-One
3D printing was supposed to disrupt prosthetic costs. It hasn’t.

So what do you think would need to change in order for 3D printing to actually deliver on the promise of cheaper prosthetics?

Marketplace All-in-One
3D printing was supposed to disrupt prosthetic costs. It hasn’t.

The American healthcare system obviously has its own idiosyncrasies, but I'm curious if sort of on a global level you think that 3D printing will ever deliver on, you know, the promise of reducing the cost of these devices.

Marketplace All-in-One
3D printing was supposed to disrupt prosthetic costs. It hasn’t.

So bottom line, do you think that this technology will successfully bring costs down at some point?

Marketplace All-in-One
3D printing was supposed to disrupt prosthetic costs. It hasn’t.

That was writer Britt Young.

Marketplace All-in-One
3D printing was supposed to disrupt prosthetic costs. It hasn’t.

We've linked to her article about the complicated economics of 3D printed prosthetics at our website, marketplacetech.org.

← Previous Page 1 of 2 Next →