Melissa Murray

No, Alito, Gorsuch, Thomas are definitely red pilling on Newsmax and Fox. Like, they have a very steady diet that is fueled by that kind of media. So, yes, they would be receptive.

No, Alito, Gorsuch, Thomas are definitely red pilling on Newsmax and Fox. Like, they have a very steady diet that is fueled by that kind of media. So, yes, they would be receptive.

No, Alito, Gorsuch, Thomas are definitely red pilling on Newsmax and Fox. Like, they have a very steady diet that is fueled by that kind of media. So, yes, they would be receptive.

Oh, wow. Well, can I say something first about the five to four? Let me stall for a minute while I think about this.

Oh, wow. Well, can I say something first about the five to four? Let me stall for a minute while I think about this.

Oh, wow. Well, can I say something first about the five to four? Let me stall for a minute while I think about this.

She really did everything but call Adam Schiff shifty Schiff in that moment. Yeah. Okay. So one thing I'll say about this, and if your listeners are not following the Supreme Court closely, you should be. Please tune in to Strict Scrutiny.

She really did everything but call Adam Schiff shifty Schiff in that moment. Yeah. Okay. So one thing I'll say about this, and if your listeners are not following the Supreme Court closely, you should be. Please tune in to Strict Scrutiny.

She really did everything but call Adam Schiff shifty Schiff in that moment. Yeah. Okay. So one thing I'll say about this, and if your listeners are not following the Supreme Court closely, you should be. Please tune in to Strict Scrutiny.

The court is wild right now, and it is a really critical part of the government and facilitates a lot of the Republican agenda, whether it is done in a very visible way or in more sort of vote-y ways. I will just say about this decision, it was handled on the court's shadow docket.

The court is wild right now, and it is a really critical part of the government and facilitates a lot of the Republican agenda, whether it is done in a very visible way or in more sort of vote-y ways. I will just say about this decision, it was handled on the court's shadow docket.

The court is wild right now, and it is a really critical part of the government and facilitates a lot of the Republican agenda, whether it is done in a very visible way or in more sort of vote-y ways. I will just say about this decision, it was handled on the court's shadow docket.

The shadow docket is essentially the place where the court handles emergency petitions, often in the context of the death penalty, but not always. And this case came up on the shadow docket.

The shadow docket is essentially the place where the court handles emergency petitions, often in the context of the death penalty, but not always. And this case came up on the shadow docket.

The shadow docket is essentially the place where the court handles emergency petitions, often in the context of the death penalty, but not always. And this case came up on the shadow docket.

Right. So you've heard of the shadow docket. Generally on the shadow docket, the critique about handling cases on the shadow docket is that they're typically not argued in full before the Supreme Court like a regular case would be. And when the justices make their decisions, they're not obliged to issue a full opinion, nor are the justices obliged.

Right. So you've heard of the shadow docket. Generally on the shadow docket, the critique about handling cases on the shadow docket is that they're typically not argued in full before the Supreme Court like a regular case would be. And when the justices make their decisions, they're not obliged to issue a full opinion, nor are the justices obliged.

Right. So you've heard of the shadow docket. Generally on the shadow docket, the critique about handling cases on the shadow docket is that they're typically not argued in full before the Supreme Court like a regular case would be. And when the justices make their decisions, they're not obliged to issue a full opinion, nor are the justices obliged.

necessarily signing their names to the position that they took. So you don't actually, you'll know the number lineup, but you don't know which justices were in the majority or in the dissent or whatever. What was so interesting about this particular case was a 5-4 decision.

necessarily signing their names to the position that they took. So you don't actually, you'll know the number lineup, but you don't know which justices were in the majority or in the dissent or whatever. What was so interesting about this particular case was a 5-4 decision.