Michael Moynihan

You can't, I don't think, shut down USAID without having an act of Congress. It is statutorily authorized by Congress twice.

You can't, I don't think, shut down USAID without having an act of Congress. It is statutorily authorized by Congress twice.

You can't, I don't think, shut down USAID without having an act of Congress. It is statutorily authorized by Congress twice.

Walter Kern. Yeah.

Walter Kern. Yeah.

Walter Kern. Yeah.

It's an 80-20 issue. I once interviewed Rand Paul. He's like, in politics is a search for 80-20 issues to be on the right side of. And he was using it at that time talking about both foreign aid, U.S. foreign aid, and also in his opposition to the Syrian war back when Barack Obama and John Kerry opposed. We're drawing red lines.

It's an 80-20 issue. I once interviewed Rand Paul. He's like, in politics is a search for 80-20 issues to be on the right side of. And he was using it at that time talking about both foreign aid, U.S. foreign aid, and also in his opposition to the Syrian war back when Barack Obama and John Kerry opposed. We're drawing red lines.

It's an 80-20 issue. I once interviewed Rand Paul. He's like, in politics is a search for 80-20 issues to be on the right side of. And he was using it at that time talking about both foreign aid, U.S. foreign aid, and also in his opposition to the Syrian war back when Barack Obama and John Kerry opposed. We're drawing red lines.

They wanted to intervene into Syria, but the American public did not have an appetite for that back in 2013. I predict that we're not going to hear much about this beginning in about 24 hours because precisely it is an 80 to 20 issue. And also he does have broad authority under Title IX.

They wanted to intervene into Syria, but the American public did not have an appetite for that back in 2013. I predict that we're not going to hear much about this beginning in about 24 hours because precisely it is an 80 to 20 issue. And also he does have broad authority under Title IX.

They wanted to intervene into Syria, but the American public did not have an appetite for that back in 2013. I predict that we're not going to hear much about this beginning in about 24 hours because precisely it is an 80 to 20 issue. And also he does have broad authority under Title IX.

This is the fourth successive presidency that has changed Title IX, the interpretation of Title IX, beginning with Barack Obama, disastrously, in my view, changing the due process requirements to adjudicate campus sexual assault cases back in 2013, I think it was, or 14, which Trump, to his credit, changed back. And then Biden changed back and then Trump changed back.

This is the fourth successive presidency that has changed Title IX, the interpretation of Title IX, beginning with Barack Obama, disastrously, in my view, changing the due process requirements to adjudicate campus sexual assault cases back in 2013, I think it was, or 14, which Trump, to his credit, changed back. And then Biden changed back and then Trump changed back.

This is the fourth successive presidency that has changed Title IX, the interpretation of Title IX, beginning with Barack Obama, disastrously, in my view, changing the due process requirements to adjudicate campus sexual assault cases back in 2013, I think it was, or 14, which Trump, to his credit, changed back. And then Biden changed back and then Trump changed back.

But Title IX is about like the big portion of it is about women's sports in college. So it kind of makes sense to interpret it to have to do with women. So yeah.

But Title IX is about like the big portion of it is about women's sports in college. So it kind of makes sense to interpret it to have to do with women. So yeah.

But Title IX is about like the big portion of it is about women's sports in college. So it kind of makes sense to interpret it to have to do with women. So yeah.

Because it's an 80-20 issue, because it's sort of been like a paper tiger, it's been based on the pushing through these things has been based on people's silence in not taking the JK Rowling approach because it wasn't worth the hassle to raise your voice about it. Megan, I don't know if you know that sometimes you get blowback if you bring this up in certain areas of the media.

Because it's an 80-20 issue, because it's sort of been like a paper tiger, it's been based on the pushing through these things has been based on people's silence in not taking the JK Rowling approach because it wasn't worth the hassle to raise your voice about it. Megan, I don't know if you know that sometimes you get blowback if you bring this up in certain areas of the media.