Michael

The US has released executive orders, and countries like Canada and Australia are drafting their own guidelines.

And that creates a gap.

Who decides what's fair, what's private, and what's legal when the lines between public and private are blurry?

And we need better public understanding.

AI policy isn't just for lawyers and tech experts.

It's for all of us.

Now, this all sounds big and far away, but it's not.

You can advocate for AI policy in your city, school, or country.

Educators can teach algorithmic literacy and students can organize awareness campaigns.

Communities can demand audits and public input on AI projects.

One last idea.

Citizen assemblies diverse groups of everyday people helping shape AI rules.

It's happening in the UK, France, and even Brazil.

And I'm Mikko.

Today, we're going to tackle something stirring up a lot of conversation and controversy in the AI world, GPT-5, and why so many users are calling it

underwhelming.

But in reality,

For a lot of people, GPT-5 feels slower, less accurate, and more restricted than they expected.

And instead of delivering a groundbreaking leap, it feels like a step sideways or even backward in some areas.

And many feel that it's too safe and over-filtered to the point that conversations feel sanitized.