Mike Benz

We don't. There could be bombshells, there could be a nothing burger, There could be bombshells that are redacted. I know that the president has come out and said that he's going to try to prevent any redactions from this was when Pam Bondi declared that they were going to come out a while ago.

She said subject to, you know, redactions about national security concerns around the I guess this was around the Epstein disclosures. And that prompted this sort of public backlash. What could undermine U.S. national security about what's in the Epstein documents?

She said subject to, you know, redactions about national security concerns around the I guess this was around the Epstein disclosures. And that prompted this sort of public backlash. What could undermine U.S. national security about what's in the Epstein documents?

She said subject to, you know, redactions about national security concerns around the I guess this was around the Epstein disclosures. And that prompted this sort of public backlash. What could undermine U.S. national security about what's in the Epstein documents?

And I think there's a similar perception about the JFK assassination that there are implications for national security and for American standing if it does turn out that there was malfeasance or foreknowledge coming from the national security state. There's a lot of very strange evidence around the role of our own intelligence services in the death of JFK.

And I think there's a similar perception about the JFK assassination that there are implications for national security and for American standing if it does turn out that there was malfeasance or foreknowledge coming from the national security state. There's a lot of very strange evidence around the role of our own intelligence services in the death of JFK.

And I think there's a similar perception about the JFK assassination that there are implications for national security and for American standing if it does turn out that there was malfeasance or foreknowledge coming from the national security state. There's a lot of very strange evidence around the role of our own intelligence services in the death of JFK.

There's a great book called JFK and the Unspeakable, which documents much of this. You know, the CIA was opening the mail, for example, of Lee Harvey Oswald for months before the assassination, suspecting formally that he was a counter... It was a counterintelligence probe, basically, that he might be working for Russia, and so...

There's a great book called JFK and the Unspeakable, which documents much of this. You know, the CIA was opening the mail, for example, of Lee Harvey Oswald for months before the assassination, suspecting formally that he was a counter... It was a counterintelligence probe, basically, that he might be working for Russia, and so...

There's a great book called JFK and the Unspeakable, which documents much of this. You know, the CIA was opening the mail, for example, of Lee Harvey Oswald for months before the assassination, suspecting formally that he was a counter... It was a counterintelligence probe, basically, that he might be working for Russia, and so...

and basically monitoring his communications and mail beforehand, you have a number of other strange circumstances around the events that happened that day. And if it did turn out, for example, that there was a role of our own intelligence services in that assassination, you can imagine the diplomatic backlash that would have for our own State Department.

and basically monitoring his communications and mail beforehand, you have a number of other strange circumstances around the events that happened that day. And if it did turn out, for example, that there was a role of our own intelligence services in that assassination, you can imagine the diplomatic backlash that would have for our own State Department.

and basically monitoring his communications and mail beforehand, you have a number of other strange circumstances around the events that happened that day. And if it did turn out, for example, that there was a role of our own intelligence services in that assassination, you can imagine the diplomatic backlash that would have for our own State Department.

When we go around and we accuse the FSB or something in Russia or Chinese intelligence services or Iranian intelligence services of malfeasance or human rights violations,

When we go around and we accuse the FSB or something in Russia or Chinese intelligence services or Iranian intelligence services of malfeasance or human rights violations,

When we go around and we accuse the FSB or something in Russia or Chinese intelligence services or Iranian intelligence services of malfeasance or human rights violations,

If it turned out that our own intelligence services were involved in or allowed purposefully the assassination of our own president, especially one whose name lives on in, you know, the Kennedy family is still a significant part of the Democrat Party. You have Bobby Kennedy, who is the current head of HHS. This is not ancient history. This is a family name that lives on.

If it turned out that our own intelligence services were involved in or allowed purposefully the assassination of our own president, especially one whose name lives on in, you know, the Kennedy family is still a significant part of the Democrat Party. You have Bobby Kennedy, who is the current head of HHS. This is not ancient history. This is a family name that lives on.

If it turned out that our own intelligence services were involved in or allowed purposefully the assassination of our own president, especially one whose name lives on in, you know, the Kennedy family is still a significant part of the Democrat Party. You have Bobby Kennedy, who is the current head of HHS. This is not ancient history. This is a family name that lives on.

That would have, I think, implications diplomatically for U.S. standing abroad. And I could see there being a knife fight within the national security community about trying to redact the most damning evidence. And so this is really one of the first litmus tests about how serious the Trump administration is about cleaning up the agencies in terms of transparency for past malfeasance.