Mike Benz

And basically, day one, Lula enacts this ethanol fuel mandate directly profiting.

So you have this left-wing guy who a lot of people say Soros is a socialist communist, but he runs a capitalist hedge fund and private equity fund

And you have the party that he has gotten into office through $100 million in election cycle donations, and therefore he gets say over the personnel at the State Department and White House and CIA to enact these policies, and they immediately turn around and implement a –

kind of communist socialist energy policy but the whole thing is profiting his capitalist business and so you have this kind of inversion of communism and capitalism that plays out that's just that's just an example in the ethanol business but again if you think about things like vaccines or public health or any any number of right right right you know these type of businesses and

How dare you?

Well, but there's some important context here because the interviewer said you realize that by saying that on record in your statement that the defense counsel in the Tyler Robinson case can cite that in his defense if he pleads like, you know, not guilty and says,

say that actually it wasn't me who did it.

It may have been some other thing, and the FBI didn't do that.

And we know that because this individual made this public statement.

And the interviewer said, so because you said that, you know that you could be called as a witness by the defense counsel to testify under oath that that is true.

And he said, yeah, I recognize that.

I would not welcome that, but I recognize that I would do that.

I would do that.

I'd say, well, now I have doubt.

Right.

But then the then the prosecutors would then call an FBI, you know, someone in the FBI chain of command to testify against.

that, you know, as to the reasons for that, you'd have to, I mean, you'd have to- What's the reason?

Well, you could argue that ODNI is not a law enforcement, you know, authority that the, you know, for whatever reasons relating to, and again, I'm not

invest or particularly up on the nuances of the Tyler Robinson case.

But I could see a world in which the explanation they offer is that, you know, because of the time sensitivity and focus on the existing leads, expanding this and the delays that would cause in the process and the compelling nature of the evidence.