Mike Benz

uh north american lng uh their their stock prices went to the moon they they've had something like you know triple the you know the profits or something for for a certain period of months uh you know following that and reap these windfall benefits um and you know the the this is we're sort of confronting the ghost of ronald reagan here because you know the the the

uh north american lng uh their their stock prices went to the moon they they've had something like you know triple the you know the profits or something for for a certain period of months uh you know following that and reap these windfall benefits um and you know the the this is we're sort of confronting the ghost of ronald reagan here because you know the the the

The reason you do that for statecraft purposes is trickle-down economics. What's good for ExxonMobil is good for the American citizens. And so if so, a dirty deed done to advance, you know... Big oil, big ag, big tech, whatever it is, anything that's good for them is good for us. And so anything that the U.S.

The reason you do that for statecraft purposes is trickle-down economics. What's good for ExxonMobil is good for the American citizens. And so if so, a dirty deed done to advance, you know... Big oil, big ag, big tech, whatever it is, anything that's good for them is good for us. And so anything that the U.S.

The reason you do that for statecraft purposes is trickle-down economics. What's good for ExxonMobil is good for the American citizens. And so if so, a dirty deed done to advance, you know... Big oil, big ag, big tech, whatever it is, anything that's good for them is good for us. And so anything that the U.S.

government can do in the form of overt or covert diplomacy or covert influence in the region that tips the scales in favor of those – U.S. corporate interests or U.S. multinational interests will ultimately trickle down to the people itself. I mean, that's the logic. I understand.

government can do in the form of overt or covert diplomacy or covert influence in the region that tips the scales in favor of those – U.S. corporate interests or U.S. multinational interests will ultimately trickle down to the people itself. I mean, that's the logic. I understand.

government can do in the form of overt or covert diplomacy or covert influence in the region that tips the scales in favor of those – U.S. corporate interests or U.S. multinational interests will ultimately trickle down to the people itself. I mean, that's the logic. I understand.

Take the Pepsi coup in 1973. We overthrew the government of Chile. We toppled the Allende government. And 30 years later, 35 years later, files were declassified that showed that the chairman of the Pepsi-Cola company had lobbied the Secretary of State that U.S. national interests in the form of Pepsi-Cola bottling operations were going to be devastated if INDA was allowed one bottle

Take the Pepsi coup in 1973. We overthrew the government of Chile. We toppled the Allende government. And 30 years later, 35 years later, files were declassified that showed that the chairman of the Pepsi-Cola company had lobbied the Secretary of State that U.S. national interests in the form of Pepsi-Cola bottling operations were going to be devastated if INDA was allowed one bottle

Take the Pepsi coup in 1973. We overthrew the government of Chile. We toppled the Allende government. And 30 years later, 35 years later, files were declassified that showed that the chairman of the Pepsi-Cola company had lobbied the Secretary of State that U.S. national interests in the form of Pepsi-Cola bottling operations were going to be devastated if INDA was allowed one bottle

It was allowed to remain in power. And I forget if he was nationalizing some element. Yeah. But basically, you know, Pepsi had these bottling operations there. It was going to massively, you know, tank their capacity to produce the cans for Pepsi bottles. And so. a meeting was organized between, uh, it was like, it was, it was the, it was the CIA director at the time.

It was allowed to remain in power. And I forget if he was nationalizing some element. Yeah. But basically, you know, Pepsi had these bottling operations there. It was going to massively, you know, tank their capacity to produce the cans for Pepsi bottles. And so. a meeting was organized between, uh, it was like, it was, it was the, it was the CIA director at the time.

It was allowed to remain in power. And I forget if he was nationalizing some element. Yeah. But basically, you know, Pepsi had these bottling operations there. It was going to massively, you know, tank their capacity to produce the cans for Pepsi bottles. And so. a meeting was organized between, uh, it was like, it was, it was the, it was the CIA director at the time.

And, and the chairman of Pepsi Cola, everyone can look up the guardian article on this. Just type in Pepsi, Ku, Chile. And, uh, So the chairman of Pepsi and the head of the Central Intelligence Agency have a planning meeting about the best way to overthrow a government in order to preserve Pepsi's profits.

And, and the chairman of Pepsi Cola, everyone can look up the guardian article on this. Just type in Pepsi, Ku, Chile. And, uh, So the chairman of Pepsi and the head of the Central Intelligence Agency have a planning meeting about the best way to overthrow a government in order to preserve Pepsi's profits.

And, and the chairman of Pepsi Cola, everyone can look up the guardian article on this. Just type in Pepsi, Ku, Chile. And, uh, So the chairman of Pepsi and the head of the Central Intelligence Agency have a planning meeting about the best way to overthrow a government in order to preserve Pepsi's profits.

And they even bring in to the meeting, the meeting minutes show, they bring in basically the State Department's media guy for the region who ran a web of print media and radio stations. so that the media guy could be brought into the propaganda that was being co-generated effectively by the CIA and Pepsi. Well, I mean, this plays out everywhere as multinational corporations Can benefit from U.S.

And they even bring in to the meeting, the meeting minutes show, they bring in basically the State Department's media guy for the region who ran a web of print media and radio stations. so that the media guy could be brought into the propaganda that was being co-generated effectively by the CIA and Pepsi. Well, I mean, this plays out everywhere as multinational corporations Can benefit from U.S.

And they even bring in to the meeting, the meeting minutes show, they bring in basically the State Department's media guy for the region who ran a web of print media and radio stations. so that the media guy could be brought into the propaganda that was being co-generated effectively by the CIA and Pepsi. Well, I mean, this plays out everywhere as multinational corporations Can benefit from U.S.