Mike Collins

so lighting was not my friend that day what are you 50 50 on this one too i think this one's you know maybe leans more towards towards natural but uh i don't know again with all this stuff you know we were talking about before i think if there's even a percentage of a chance it's worth exploring um

so lighting was not my friend that day what are you 50 50 on this one too i think this one's you know maybe leans more towards towards natural but uh i don't know again with all this stuff you know we were talking about before i think if there's even a percentage of a chance it's worth exploring um

You know, I fail to see from archaeology's perspective what the harm is in researching any of these things. You know, I've talked about this with Jimmy before. We've had discussions about this. Corsetti?

You know, I fail to see from archaeology's perspective what the harm is in researching any of these things. You know, I've talked about this with Jimmy before. We've had discussions about this. Corsetti?

You know, I fail to see from archaeology's perspective what the harm is in researching any of these things. You know, I've talked about this with Jimmy before. We've had discussions about this. Corsetti?

that either way it's a win you're doing more research and so you're gathering more data on a site to either determine that it was an ancient site or not and if it's not you've still gathered a bunch of valuable information on a really unique geological feature right so it's a win-win so you know um Yeah, I've never quite understood the outright dismissal of things and not exploring.

that either way it's a win you're doing more research and so you're gathering more data on a site to either determine that it was an ancient site or not and if it's not you've still gathered a bunch of valuable information on a really unique geological feature right so it's a win-win so you know um Yeah, I've never quite understood the outright dismissal of things and not exploring.

that either way it's a win you're doing more research and so you're gathering more data on a site to either determine that it was an ancient site or not and if it's not you've still gathered a bunch of valuable information on a really unique geological feature right so it's a win-win so you know um Yeah, I've never quite understood the outright dismissal of things and not exploring.

But it's like we talked about a little bit about last night. I mean, ultimately, what are you boiling down these arguments to? It's really an argument of free speech, being able to speak your mind freely, publicly, have a platform and say what you think and feel.

But it's like we talked about a little bit about last night. I mean, ultimately, what are you boiling down these arguments to? It's really an argument of free speech, being able to speak your mind freely, publicly, have a platform and say what you think and feel.

But it's like we talked about a little bit about last night. I mean, ultimately, what are you boiling down these arguments to? It's really an argument of free speech, being able to speak your mind freely, publicly, have a platform and say what you think and feel.

it's not really about who's right or wrong because I mean, they're, they're basically saying that people should be quiet about stuff like this or not. We're like, you know what, the science is settled. And, uh, I think there's just a fundamental disagreement there, um, between the two schools of thought with, you know, all that's kind of going on, at least on social media between, um,

it's not really about who's right or wrong because I mean, they're, they're basically saying that people should be quiet about stuff like this or not. We're like, you know what, the science is settled. And, uh, I think there's just a fundamental disagreement there, um, between the two schools of thought with, you know, all that's kind of going on, at least on social media between, um,

it's not really about who's right or wrong because I mean, they're, they're basically saying that people should be quiet about stuff like this or not. We're like, you know what, the science is settled. And, uh, I think there's just a fundamental disagreement there, um, between the two schools of thought with, you know, all that's kind of going on, at least on social media between, um,

creators and explorers and then the archaeological community um let's try to think of a different word than alternative history there

creators and explorers and then the archaeological community um let's try to think of a different word than alternative history there

creators and explorers and then the archaeological community um let's try to think of a different word than alternative history there

And that side seems to have a real fear of being wrong about anything, which is, in my opinion, completely anti-science. Whereas the other side, people over here are like, you know, I'll speak for myself, I have no problem being wrong about stuff. I don't, like, isn't that how you're supposed to get to answers?

And that side seems to have a real fear of being wrong about anything, which is, in my opinion, completely anti-science. Whereas the other side, people over here are like, you know, I'll speak for myself, I have no problem being wrong about stuff. I don't, like, isn't that how you're supposed to get to answers?

And that side seems to have a real fear of being wrong about anything, which is, in my opinion, completely anti-science. Whereas the other side, people over here are like, you know, I'll speak for myself, I have no problem being wrong about stuff. I don't, like, isn't that how you're supposed to get to answers?