Mike Corey

And I think the...

whatever it is that is this nasty thing that's been latched onto humanity, whatever you wanna call it or whatever you wanna like identify it as that has allowed for, has carried out such atrocities like 9-11 as something done to, as a sacrifice to people living here in the United States in order to justify this expansionist,

surveillance grid and policy of a new crusade in the Middle East and whatever else came out of that as different clusters of intention that were all bad.

Whatever it is, it wants us to have lazy reason.

It doesn't want us to utilize this thing that tends to, when we do water that metaphysical garden, we tend to

come up with solution concepts to problems that are foreboding that we're not supposed to think about when faced with objective problems that we could then look at think about wrap our minds around being formed by historical lessons act accordingly we tend to be a lot less inclined to just adapt to some slave uh cage or some choice given to us to say okay you can be free with a number of flavors inside this particular cage and

We don't play those types of closed system games.

Right.

Oh yeah, yeah, yeah.

Okay, like controlled dialectic stuff.

Yeah, I think we were throwing out, the example I think was also Darwinism.

I think we were chatting about that a little bit.

It was like when Thomas Huxley, who was Darwin's like manager or handler, was setting up the debate.

So that was probably it.

That's what we talked more about.

Yes, that's what it was.

um when he's framing the debates to market this new uh explanation this new explanatory model of the origins of species um darwin first of all wasn't equipped to go and defend his own positions in public but thomas huxley was the one who carried most of the weight and was really sardonic had a lot of weight was really good at eviscerating his opponents but he also made a point to

set up these highly, highly covered like media events with him and usually some super rigid Anglican creationist, rigid creationist opponent who he would then set up as the opponent to science, which would be usually him representing Darwin.

And of course, then, you know, if you know exactly the core axioms of the creationist, rigid, you know, the Bible is the literal truth of God framework, then you can make fun of it.

You can run circles around it if you've got more to play with.