Mike Davis

Well, I think I can buy part of that, but I do question whether the strategic importance of Greenland, in his mind, is really what's at stake here.

Because Greenland is important, but it's not that important.

And in everything that we want to do in Greenland, we could do without acquiring the territory.

And the idea that somehow legally we would not defend it, well, we defend bases, US bases, all over the world.

They're in all different countries.

And we do have this thing called Article V with NATO,

which says we're going to defend, uh, France and Germany and the other NATO countries.

So I'm not sure he's on firm ground legally when he, when he says we need it in order to defend it.

Um, but I do think that, and we played on our show, Howard Lutnick's, uh, bite, which I thought was very revealing where he talked to your point that Europe has followed this path of globalization and globalization has been a failure.

Um, and that to me is the theme of the administration at, uh,

And I think that's a powerful theme.

And I think that Lutnik in particular, because he made the point, he said, why would you go in the direction of electrification and trying to be sort of carbon neutral by 2030 if you don't even make your own batteries?

It was sort of like, oh, yeah, that's a really good way to put it.

So I think that message to Europe, we'll see if it gets through.

The other thing that he said to your point, Megan, is he said that he knows that the U.S.

will come to defend Europe.

He's not so sure that the opposite is true.

And that...

That makes you think as well.

I mean, would France and Britain come to our defense?