Mike Davis

It's going to be – I'm going to make damn sure these people –

go to prison and i'm going to do it very publicly uh so article three project dot org article number three project dot org you can follow us on social media uh donate but only what you can afford and take action action action action as we always say is the war rooms war room posse's superpower mike davis the viceroy thank you so much for joining us today appreciate you thank you

There's only one news article that meets that criteria, according to the New York Times, if you do a search. And it's an article about Yahoo aiding the U.S. email surveillance by adapting a spam filter. Not the Hillary Clinton stuff, right? So if that's the case, right, and if John agrees, if that's the case, then there is no lie. That's right, because you remember what the question was by Cruz. It had to involve the Clintons.

We believe has led to this indictment. We're pretty sure the Ted Cruz exchange is the basis of the indictment. We're just not sure exactly which leak or article he's talking about here. On May 3rd, 2017, in this committee, Chairman Grassley asked you point blank, quote, Have you ever been an anonymous source in news reports about matters relating to the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation? You responded under oath, quote, never.

He then asked you, quote, have you ever authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports about the Trump investigation or the Clinton administration? You responded again under oath, no. Now, as you know, Mr. McCabe, who works for you, has publicly and repeatedly stated that he leaked information to the Wall Street Journal and that you were directly aware of it and that you directly authorized it. Now,

What Mr. McCabe is saying and what you testified to this committee cannot both be true. One or the other is false. Who's telling the truth? I can only speak to my testimony. I stand by the testimony you summarized that I gave in May of 2017. So your testimony is you've never authorized anyone to leak. And Mr. McCabe, if he says contrary, is not telling the truth. Is that correct? Again, I'm not going to characterize Andy's testimony, but mine is the same today.

In this committee Chairman Grassley asked you point blank, quote, have you ever been an anonymous source in news reports about matters relating to the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation? You responded under oath, quote, never. He then asked you, quote, have you ever authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports about the Trump investigation or the Clinton administration? You responded again under oath, no.

As you know, Mr. McCabe, who works for you, has publicly and repeatedly stated that he leaked information to the Wall Street Journal and that you were directly aware of it and that you directly authorized it. Now, what Mr. McCabe is saying and what you testified to this committee cannot both be true. One or the other is false. Who's telling the truth?

I can only speak to my testimony. I stand by what the testimony you summarized that I gave in May of 2017. So your testimony is you've never authorized anyone to leak. And Mr. McCabe, if he says contrary, is not telling the truth. Is that correct? Again, I'm not going to characterize Andy's testimony, but mine is the same today.

Oliko se Letitia James, johon hän laittoi kohtiaan? Hän oli itseasiassa itseasiassa itseasiassa itseasiassa itseasiassa itseasiassa itseasiassa itseasiassa itseasiassa itseasiassa itseasiassa itseasiassa

All right, keep going, Dan. Yes, well, so when it comes to vindictive prosecution, that's what they're going to rely on, and they're going to use the president's words here rather than the prosecutor's words. They'll show that the US attorney, the acting US attorney, was someone who was appointed for this purpose, and within days...

under Bill Barr and who prosecuted Joe Biden's son. Let's see if the Justice Department does that. He was dragged into that kicking and screaming Mike Davis. I would say this. I want to remind everyone.

For having me.

Thank you very much.

Mr. President, I would like to ask about Gaza.

Are you on the same page, Mr. Erdogan, for Palestine, Israel?

And in that sense, Turkey being the second largest army in NATO, it needs to support its air force and air defense.

this issue in general, as a NATO, because it's an Eastern Plain world?

The Press We want to sell F-35s to Turkey, fighter jets, F-35s.

We want to sell them to Turkey.