Mike Davis

said that strikes might be needed or imminent to protect American assets in the region.

I think all of that is going to suddenly become very important.

It was definitely important before, but now in light of who's authorizing what and on what legal grounds the administration is acting, it's going to be key because coming out of that briefing, Democrats like Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries had a lot of questions and they were not supportive of what the administration was telling them.

And certainly that's going to be important as the administration...

might maybe try to argue, well, we consulted with members of Congress.

Certainly members of Congress have not voted on any of this, and that's key.

But I think we're watching these fault lines begin to emerge as we start questioning what happened here, under what authorization, and importantly, what might come next.

Yes, a Democrat judge in California just sided with the Trump administration when California Governor Gavin Newsom tried to tell ICE agents, federal officers, what they can and can't wear.

That's not the state's job.

There's the supremacy clause.

And Congress has power over immigration.

Congress wrote these immigration laws decades ago on behalf of we, the people, exercising we, the people's most crucial sovereign power to control our border and populace, to decide who comes and decide who goes.

And the president

has the constitutional power and duty to execute Congress's laws on behalf of we, the people, and that's what President Trump is doing.

And when you're exercising federal law, states don't get to come in and micromanage or even interfere in any way with federal law.

So this Democrat judge followed clear law from decades ago,

that the federal law is the supreme law of the lands.

Immigration is decided by federal law, and Gavin Newsom can go to hell.

Yeah, I mean, I would say to these Democrats who want to beat up immigration agents, these Democrats should look in the mirror.

It's their laws.