moses

And I thought that was a good use of time.

Yeah, I wonder why, like, this is an interesting question because I never really understood it.

I remember I got into flom about this on Twitter, but this was a long time ago.

This would have been like four or five years ago where he wanted to be able to co-stream.

And I was like, but why?

Like, you're not doing it.

You're just doing live React content.

And then the angle that I've heard is, oh, they bring in a new viewer base.

Well, not if they're endemic to Counter-Strike, right?

Like if we're talking about somebody like, I don't know,

if Kadriel said he wanted to stream the Cologne major or whatever, it's like, yeah, okay, like, cool.

He's going to bring in a league audience to watch Counter-Strike.

But when it's a Counter-Strike person co-streaming a Counter-Strike thing, I agree with the sense of like, you are...

doing yourself a disservice as a TO, but clearly they don't see that way, Janko.

It's just us that sees it that way.

Well, especially when I said that the owner clicks off as soon as it goes into anything that's not the game.

So if you are one of these sponsors being sold on these hours watched or minutes watched and he streams up the whole time, well, when the desk's up and there's the graphics on screen, they're not seeing it there, right?

But that's it.

It's all propped up on this.

Well, I think I think Yanko is right in the sense that they can just use those numbers and and show the sponsors like, oh, yeah, we were also being streamed here, here and here.