Nagananda Anur

We just integrate with those.

And that way, you know, the end application gets stable platform.

And then the product like SLM abstracts it out and then further simplifies the way they can consume storage against our platform.

Yes, I think that's an excellent point.

So the notion of tenancy is very much required.

You can come in and say, yeah, this is a tenant and accordingly we can do the provisioning.

So, the version one of this product, the notion of tenancy doesn't exist yet.

It's still at the provider plane.

In other words, the calling application has to manage the tenancy, but we understand this is something needs to be there in the product.

What we have done is we have spec'd out the plan where how the tenancy needs to happen.

So we, what we call tenant management, where each tenant is associated with certain entitlements and the kind of storage they're allowed to provision, how much they're allowed to provision, and especially in a shared infrastructure,

How many lands and how many volumes are allowed to provision?

Those kind of things can be associated with the tenant.

And Amit talked about all these RPO.

So then we also look at the location of the tenant is identified that way DR and backups are sent to appropriate locations based on where we onboard the tenant.

All those things actually we have mapped out.

except that in all these things, it's a big list that the PMO really would wanted in the first release, didn't fit in the releases.

It is there and it's going to be the upcoming releases and we're going to bring these things in.

The short answer is we don't have strong tenancy notion, but we expect to bring it in very soon in subsequent releases.

Yeah, exactly.