Nancy Grace

There is in the second phase of the trial, which is the sentencing phase, where the jury will decide whether he gets the death penalty. Now, regarding autism, the defense wanted to bring in their theory that he has autism, although apparently none of the defense experts have stated thus far that he is autistic or under the spectrum. None of them have said that.

There is in the second phase of the trial, which is the sentencing phase, where the jury will decide whether he gets the death penalty. Now, regarding autism, the defense wanted to bring in their theory that he has autism, although apparently none of the defense experts have stated thus far that he is autistic or under the spectrum. None of them have said that.

There is in the second phase of the trial, which is the sentencing phase, where the jury will decide whether he gets the death penalty. Now, regarding autism, the defense wanted to bring in their theory that he has autism, although apparently none of the defense experts have stated thus far that he is autistic or under the spectrum. None of them have said that.

They said they wanted to bring it in, as you surmised, because of his odd behavior. What odd behavior, the judge says. I don't see any odd behavior. He just sits there. So, therefore, that's irrelevant. If it becomes relevant, then I will review your motion again, if you choose to renew it.

They said they wanted to bring it in, as you surmised, because of his odd behavior. What odd behavior, the judge says. I don't see any odd behavior. He just sits there. So, therefore, that's irrelevant. If it becomes relevant, then I will review your motion again, if you choose to renew it.

They said they wanted to bring it in, as you surmised, because of his odd behavior. What odd behavior, the judge says. I don't see any odd behavior. He just sits there. So, therefore, that's irrelevant. If it becomes relevant, then I will review your motion again, if you choose to renew it.

But as of right now, the only way it would be relevant is if they noted quirky or odd behavior when he takes a stand. So if you want to bring it in then sure, but he'll have to take the stand because just sitting there, I don't see any relevance. Um, however,

But as of right now, the only way it would be relevant is if they noted quirky or odd behavior when he takes a stand. So if you want to bring it in then sure, but he'll have to take the stand because just sitting there, I don't see any relevance. Um, however,

But as of right now, the only way it would be relevant is if they noted quirky or odd behavior when he takes a stand. So if you want to bring it in then sure, but he'll have to take the stand because just sitting there, I don't see any relevance. Um, however,

If there is a guilty verdict and it goes to sentencing, I believe the judge will relent and bring in, if there is any, any expert that says he is autistic to diminish his capacity to commit a crime. Now, will it diminish his capacity to commit a crime? No, that's a big NO. Why? This guy is a PhD student. He has made stellar grades. He is actually teaching other students.

If there is a guilty verdict and it goes to sentencing, I believe the judge will relent and bring in, if there is any, any expert that says he is autistic to diminish his capacity to commit a crime. Now, will it diminish his capacity to commit a crime? No, that's a big NO. Why? This guy is a PhD student. He has made stellar grades. He is actually teaching other students.

If there is a guilty verdict and it goes to sentencing, I believe the judge will relent and bring in, if there is any, any expert that says he is autistic to diminish his capacity to commit a crime. Now, will it diminish his capacity to commit a crime? No, that's a big NO. Why? This guy is a PhD student. He has made stellar grades. He is actually teaching other students.

He is not going to be deemed incapable or incompetent to commit a crime. In fact, he was obsessed with committing crimes. You know about the questionnaires he would send violent felons. went under the guise of studying criminology. How did you feel right before you did it? How did you pick your victim? How did you make your exit? In other words, how can I get out of this without getting caught?

He is not going to be deemed incapable or incompetent to commit a crime. In fact, he was obsessed with committing crimes. You know about the questionnaires he would send violent felons. went under the guise of studying criminology. How did you feel right before you did it? How did you pick your victim? How did you make your exit? In other words, how can I get out of this without getting caught?

He is not going to be deemed incapable or incompetent to commit a crime. In fact, he was obsessed with committing crimes. You know about the questionnaires he would send violent felons. went under the guise of studying criminology. How did you feel right before you did it? How did you pick your victim? How did you make your exit? In other words, how can I get out of this without getting caught?

They're between a rock and a hard spot. His, Brian Koberger's DNA is on the knife sheath in the snap button where you put the knife in and you snap the sheath shut under a dead body. So again, rock and a hard spot. That's where they are.

They're between a rock and a hard spot. His, Brian Koberger's DNA is on the knife sheath in the snap button where you put the knife in and you snap the sheath shut under a dead body. So again, rock and a hard spot. That's where they are.

They're between a rock and a hard spot. His, Brian Koberger's DNA is on the knife sheath in the snap button where you put the knife in and you snap the sheath shut under a dead body. So again, rock and a hard spot. That's where they are.

No world. No world. As far as a guilty or not guilty, no. As far as a not guilty by reason of insanity, which he's not insane, guilty but mentally ill, he's not mentally ill. There's no way that she can usurp his ability to enter a plea, either guilty or not guilty. Or an Alford, which is, I accept my sentence, but I'm not going to say I did it.

No world. No world. As far as a guilty or not guilty, no. As far as a not guilty by reason of insanity, which he's not insane, guilty but mentally ill, he's not mentally ill. There's no way that she can usurp his ability to enter a plea, either guilty or not guilty. Or an Alford, which is, I accept my sentence, but I'm not going to say I did it.