Nancy Pelosi

On the other hand, the U.S. allows China to flood our markets with a third of their exports, and that'll probably go over 40%, and it's limitless because we have not placed any restriction. In terms of jobs, this is the biggest and cruelest hoax of all.

On the other hand, the U.S. allows China to flood our markets with a third of their exports, and that'll probably go over 40%, and it's limitless because we have not placed any restriction. In terms of jobs, this is the biggest and cruelest hoax of all.

Not only do we not have market access, not only do they have prohibitive tariffs, not only are our exports not let in very specifically, but China benefits with at least 10 million jobs from U.S.-China trade. The president in his statement... requesting this special waiver said that China trade supports 170,000 jobs in the United States. 170,000 jobs, whereas...

Not only do we not have market access, not only do they have prohibitive tariffs, not only are our exports not let in very specifically, but China benefits with at least 10 million jobs from U.S.-China trade. The president in his statement... requesting this special waiver said that China trade supports 170,000 jobs in the United States. 170,000 jobs, whereas...

Our imports from China support 10 million jobs at least. Fact is that U.S.-China trade is a job loser. And one of the reasons that it is is because in order – well, first let me just make another point, and that is that our colleagues on the other side of this issue will say that trade with China, exports to China have increased three times in the last 10 years. They have.

Our imports from China support 10 million jobs at least. Fact is that U.S.-China trade is a job loser. And one of the reasons that it is is because in order – well, first let me just make another point, and that is that our colleagues on the other side of this issue will say that trade with China, exports to China have increased three times in the last 10 years. They have.

But they failed to mention that exports imports from China have increased 11 times, thereby leading to this huge trade deficit. The other issue, in addition, if intellectual.

But they failed to mention that exports imports from China have increased 11 times, thereby leading to this huge trade deficit. The other issue, in addition, if intellectual.

$2.25 and dropping.

$2.25 and dropping.

$2.25 and dropping.

I myself don't give away anything for nothing. I think that's what happened the other day. We could have, in my view, perhaps gotten them to agree to a third way, which was a bipartisan CR for two weeks. four weeks in which we could have had bipartisan legislation to go forward.

I myself don't give away anything for nothing. I think that's what happened the other day. We could have, in my view, perhaps gotten them to agree to a third way, which was a bipartisan CR for two weeks. four weeks in which we could have had bipartisan legislation to go forward.

I myself don't give away anything for nothing. I think that's what happened the other day. We could have, in my view, perhaps gotten them to agree to a third way, which was a bipartisan CR for two weeks. four weeks in which we could have had bipartisan legislation to go forward.

Let's play it.

Let's play it.

and the rest of it. So they don't want them to see that contrast, so they focus on something else. And it's a diversionary tactic. It's a self-fulfilling practice. You demonize, and then you, we call it the wrap-up smear. If you want to talk politics, you call it the wrap-up smear. You smear somebody with falsehoods and all the rest, and then you merchandise.

and the rest of it. So they don't want them to see that contrast, so they focus on something else. And it's a diversionary tactic. It's a self-fulfilling practice. You demonize, and then you, we call it the wrap-up smear. If you want to talk politics, you call it the wrap-up smear. You smear somebody with falsehoods and all the rest, and then you merchandise.

And then you write it, and they'll say, see, it's reported in the press that this, this, this, and this So they have that validation that the press reported the smear, and then it's called the wrap-up smear. Now I'm going to merchandise the press's report on the smear that we made. It's a tactic, and it's self-evident. Earth to wrong!

And then you write it, and they'll say, see, it's reported in the press that this, this, this, and this So they have that validation that the press reported the smear, and then it's called the wrap-up smear. Now I'm going to merchandise the press's report on the smear that we made. It's a tactic, and it's self-evident. Earth to wrong!