Narrator/Announcer

I have read this paper, and the actions, the climate actions are pretty clear. They're things like, go car-free. eat a plant-based diet, and reduce flying as much as possible. So if you are a high emitter, about half of your carbon footprint comes from transportation.

Yes. And while this paper was focused on the individual decision of whether or not to have a child, I think that part of the public's reaction to this work is had to do with these longstanding debates about population and the environment.

Yes. And while this paper was focused on the individual decision of whether or not to have a child, I think that part of the public's reaction to this work is had to do with these longstanding debates about population and the environment.

Yes. And while this paper was focused on the individual decision of whether or not to have a child, I think that part of the public's reaction to this work is had to do with these longstanding debates about population and the environment.

This is Jade Sasser, an associate professor of gender and sexuality studies and society environment and health equity at UC Riverside. And she traced this idea all the way back to the 1800s and a British economist named Thomas Robert Malthus, who was writing against British laws that offered food aid to the poor.

This is Jade Sasser, an associate professor of gender and sexuality studies and society environment and health equity at UC Riverside. And she traced this idea all the way back to the 1800s and a British economist named Thomas Robert Malthus, who was writing against British laws that offered food aid to the poor.

This is Jade Sasser, an associate professor of gender and sexuality studies and society environment and health equity at UC Riverside. And she traced this idea all the way back to the 1800s and a British economist named Thomas Robert Malthus, who was writing against British laws that offered food aid to the poor.

To be clear, this is not the argument that Kimberly and her colleague were making. But it is important to think about how this broader dialogue about population and the environment has a checkered past. And in reality, population growth, particularly when it comes to consumption, definitely has local impacts on local resources.

To be clear, this is not the argument that Kimberly and her colleague were making. But it is important to think about how this broader dialogue about population and the environment has a checkered past. And in reality, population growth, particularly when it comes to consumption, definitely has local impacts on local resources.

To be clear, this is not the argument that Kimberly and her colleague were making. But it is important to think about how this broader dialogue about population and the environment has a checkered past. And in reality, population growth, particularly when it comes to consumption, definitely has local impacts on local resources.

But science tells us that is not what is driving global climate change.

But science tells us that is not what is driving global climate change.

But science tells us that is not what is driving global climate change.

Science tells us the issue is how we live, not that we live.

Science tells us the issue is how we live, not that we live.

Science tells us the issue is how we live, not that we live.

So Kimberly Nicholas, the scientist in Sweden, talks really differently about the kid question now. Now she focuses on the actions we should take to eliminate emissions today.

So Kimberly Nicholas, the scientist in Sweden, talks really differently about the kid question now. Now she focuses on the actions we should take to eliminate emissions today.

So Kimberly Nicholas, the scientist in Sweden, talks really differently about the kid question now. Now she focuses on the actions we should take to eliminate emissions today.

Yeah. And Jade understands that, too. She is really sympathetic to the emotions that climate change elicits.