Natalie Winters

by using our sort of conception of sovereignty, as you've always talked about, right?

The Westphalian nation state, sort of using that as a pretext to then justify shifting away from that because they find that inherently problematic.

And I always say, whenever you hear people like that who-

have never used the word sovereignty before.

It doesn't exist in their vernacular.

And then all of a sudden they start talking about it like Kamala Harris did on the campaign trail.

That is an immediate red flag because it's sort of this weird distortion of what they are talking about sovereignty actually meaning.

And I think when they talk about this euphemistic new world order,

I think it sort of links back, in a weird way, it's sort of this horseshoe theory of agreement with, I think, President Trump's take on where we stand right now in America.

It's why they're taking all these desperate measures, right?

We're at an inflection point.

And I would argue it through the lens, you know, more so of the Chinese Communist Party, where we're really at the inflection point of this idea of a Thucydides trap, right?

You have a rising power.

versus declining power, saying that the United States is the latter.

But it seems like the World Economic Forum is sort of the, you know, in kaleidoscope, in full color, really prediction and rollout of what a future global order looks like, not just where the Chinese Communist Party is in control, right?

That's part of

Mark Carney's recent media tour.

But it's also just this complete, I mean, they're saying what we've said they've been admitting to, or at least clandestinely doing for years, which is usurping national sovereignty, trying to destroy populist movements in favor of a new world order.

So it's sort of this weird vindication that we've been right, but we don't want to be right on this stuff.

Well, look, you can always tell a lot about how compromised people are by the Chinese Communist Party by the way that they describe them, right?