Natalie Winters

But this is sort of like a weird form of the kinetic aspect of World War III, where you're seeing it be about, you know, industrial policy, the ability to even build the missiles and the rockets that are going to be launched to advance, you know, whether it's AI or the tech space that they're also talking about a lot at the World Economic Forum.

which we've seen obviously become a critical part of warfare too.

So it's spooky.

It's an eerie feeling.

Maybe I finally understand how the legacy media feels in the White House briefing room when President Trump is in there.

Well, look, it's not a 100 days celebration if we can't have a little bit of a meltdown montage.

So I thought it was important to air that, which, by the way, happy 100 days.

It's awesome to be here.

But the two individuals speaking before are someone, Steve, that we have talked about well before these 100 days.

They're sort of the architects of a lot of this color revolution framework.

I would say the sort of academic counterpart to the Norm Eisens of the world.

One of them is a TheyThem.

by the name of Erica Chenoweth, who essentially came up with that 3.5% figure.

And the other is Steven Levitsky, who has used basically the, I would say, guise of studying other countries and how those regimes have been toppled, typically led by United States back to color revolutions, but how they have deposed regimes.

And I think now we've certainly seen those tactics be used here against President Trump.

And why this is so important is because you can see the media, I think, already sort of creating the permission structure for violence, just outright violence to be used in these protests.

I mean, we've already seen it.

We've seen the pictures.

You know, there's a wild Axios story out today.

You sent it to me, Steve, but...