Nataliya Kosmyna

But of course, it doesn't mean that it's one second of work of the brain and then you use the tool, right?

Something like, let's say, you're in a school and maybe first semester you learn your base of whatever subject it is without any tools, like old school way.

And then on the second semester, you didn't become an expert, right, in one semester of a school year, but you at least have some base, right?

And then, let's say, in the second semester, you gained access to the tool, right?

So it might prove actually beneficial.

But again, all of this is to be still shown and proven.

We literally have very few data points.

But the tool is now being really pushed on us everywhere.

In our case, we're measuring electrical activity, so there's multiple ways of measuring things.

EEG.

EEG, yeah.

Yeah, electroencephalography, yes.

Right.

Yeah, it's a fair, it's a bit simplified, but kind of fair way.

And it doesn't mean that it's very important.

It's not that that part doesn't work, right?

Or like it atrophied itself like we saw in some... No, no, no.

It doesn't go down.

Like, listen, I'm going to give you one example, right?

It's like back to this crazy example of 3% of our brain versus 100%.