Nathan Cornacchia

So, I mean, at the same time, like, that amount of money is the type of thing where you're like, and an assassination is in play.

And.

It's like we don't know what the answer is.

There's our bet.

But it's also like why now is Turning Point trying to sue people not for – there's a thousand different things Turning Point could have been suing people for because they've been taking a lot of heat, Erica Kirk as well.

But finally when they decide to sue people, it's over investigations into the financials.

Interesting.

And you're like, hmm.

Yeah, because a lot of people thought they would go after Candace.

That's my point.

You would have thought Candace of all people would have been sued for some type of defamation or something before then.

Yeah.

Not that I think – I think Candice has been right about a lot of stuff she's looked into.

But to your point – or to my point, it's like it wasn't until the financials start getting investigated that they're like, no, no, we got to put it in.

Yeah, it's crazy how that was their – Yeah, that was their final – their break point.

It was like, no, don't talk about our money.

Yeah, and I don't think – the whole Erica's involved.

I'm critical of Erica Kirk just because –

What I don't like is – what I think Turning Point did is Turning Point decided it was strategic.

They decided they wanted to make Erica Kirk the CEO of the company so that way they would have this grieving widow defense, which is – and this is where I say you lose your ability to not be criticized when you're the CEO of a company.