Nathan Cornacchia

And then says he's not guilty.

So there's so many pieces to that.

Also, you have all the different people in the crowd.

As soon as the shot goes off, you've got George Zinn, who drops his pants and says, I'm the shooter.

I did it.

I did it.

Yeah.

And then you've got another curly-haired guy turning around, cheering on it.

I saw that.

You've got the week before the shooting, you've got five, six, seven different people posting on Twitter that Charlie Kirk is going to be killed next week.

I saw that.

And so we know that there's, at a minimum, multiple people involved in this.

But the FBI's narrative is, no, this is a lone gunman who acted 100% autonomously by himself and pulled this entire thing off when we know that's not true.

And then you add in the idea with the 30-06, and I don't know if your audience is versed in that, but the idea that

A .30-06 high-powered rifle was used to carry this out when it's a weapon system that's typically used for killing moose and elk.

The idea is it's such a powerful weapon that it's going to blow through 30 inches of elk carcass to be able to kill these big game animals.

That weapon gets used from 140 yards and hits Charlie in the neck and barely causes any damage with no exit wound.

All of those things together have just led, I think,

Everybody watching this and all of America to just be like we know Something's not right here.

We don't know what the answer is, but it's not what you're feeding us Yeah, and so the conspiracy theories I think start to fill in the gaps because we're inquisitive right people want to know like we want to know what happened and