Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Libraries Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Blog Pricing

Nathaniel Whittemore

πŸ‘€ Speaker
24919 total appearances
Voice ID

Voice Profile Active

This person's voice can be automatically recognized across podcast episodes using AI voice matching.

Voice samples: 4
Confidence: High

Appearances Over Time

Podcast Appearances

Indeed, that was the core policy of the draft that was circulated two weeks ago that seemed at the time like a done deal.

97.106 View full episode β†’

A signing ceremony had been scheduled.

103.357 View full episode β†’

A who's who of tech CEOs had been invited to attend.

105.419 View full episode β†’

However, hours before the event, President Trump pulled the order, stating, I didn't like certain aspects of it, and adding that he thought that it would get in the way of the U.S.

108.301 View full episode β†’

lead over China in the AI race.

115.868 View full episode β†’

Now, it later surfaced that former AI czar David Sachs had intervened at the 11th hour, placing a call to the president to talk him out of signing the policy, at least for now.

117.97 View full episode β†’

The order that was signed this week is substantially the same as the draft order that was scrapped a couple of weeks ago.

126.278 View full episode β†’

Both versions of the order made safety testing voluntary, although in the current climate that's not all that meaningful a distinction.

131.082 View full episode β†’

All major AI labs have agreed to submit advanced models for testing, and while some White House personnel were reportedly pushing for compulsory testing, it appears that that position never made it into a draft.

137.892 View full episode β†’

Indeed, it seems like the only significant change is that companies are encouraged to make their models available 30 days prior to public release, as opposed to the draft order which had asked for a 90-day period.

147.806 View full episode β†’

It was that 90-day period more than anything else that triggered industry backlash for its potential to significantly slow down the release cycle.

157.66 View full episode β†’

Neither version of the order provided any mechanism for the government to block a model's release.

164.65 View full episode β†’

In fact, one subtle change in the new version is an inclusion of a disclaimer which reads, "...nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize the creation of a mandatory government licensing, preclearance, or permitting requirement for the development of new AI models."

168.656 View full episode β†’

This sounds like a direct response to the critique that many had had that what the White House was doing with this executive order was a de facto licensing regime.

181.454 View full episode β†’

Functionally, however, the policy just allows the government to assess new capabilities before they're available to the public.

188.929 View full episode β†’

The NSA has been assigned primary responsibility for model testing with support from various cyber technology and defense agencies.

194.161 View full episode β†’

In addition to safety testing, the order establishes a cybersecurity clearinghouse run by the Treasury in consultation with the NSA, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.

200.531 View full episode β†’

There's also provisions instructing civilian and military agencies to harden systems against AI-driven cybersecurity risk.

210.286 View full episode β†’

Outside of the 90 to 30-day switch, the other biggest difference with this version of the order is the way that it was presented to the public.

216.436 View full episode β†’

Rather than a high-profile signing ceremony, the order was signed in private with zero fanfare.

222.494 View full episode β†’