Nick Nisi

So TLDR, at least on the breach, is there was no vulnerability. There was a vulnerability, but no one was affected by it.

I'll link this up in the show notes.

I'll link this up in the show notes.

And, you know, I mentioned this when we talked to Chris Wanstroth and Andreas, when we were talking about Lady Bird, was I think if we can incorporate, I think Safari has done some base level security things. And I believe for the most part, Apple has my privacy in check. Maybe for everyone else, maybe not so much for them.

And, you know, I mentioned this when we talked to Chris Wanstroth and Andreas, when we were talking about Lady Bird, was I think if we can incorporate, I think Safari has done some base level security things. And I believe for the most part, Apple has my privacy in check. Maybe for everyone else, maybe not so much for them.

Maybe they're using a lot of my data, but they're at least not giving it away to my knowledge. Right to repair is a whole different issue. We'll can that for now. But I feel like maybe this max enable max thing that Arc has might be things like what the pie hole does in the browser, like different security things you can do and different features that make sense that would be a paid feature.

Maybe they're using a lot of my data, but they're at least not giving it away to my knowledge. Right to repair is a whole different issue. We'll can that for now. But I feel like maybe this max enable max thing that Arc has might be things like what the pie hole does in the browser, like different security things you can do and different features that make sense that would be a paid feature.

And that would be a for profit company. Or at least a company that wants to make money to sustain, even if it's not for profit. It could be a public good company. I think when you raise money, though, we've seen that chat GPT was open. AI was once open, and now they're not open. So there can be a rug pull even in venture capital land.

And that would be a for profit company. Or at least a company that wants to make money to sustain, even if it's not for profit. It could be a public good company. I think when you raise money, though, we've seen that chat GPT was open. AI was once open, and now they're not open. So there can be a rug pull even in venture capital land.

The part I may disagree about a little bit, and the jury is still out on this for me, is that while I'm not an ARC user, I can appreciate a browser trying to be...

The part I may disagree about a little bit, and the jury is still out on this for me, is that while I'm not an ARC user, I can appreciate a browser trying to be...

sustainably capitalistic and deploy features that are paid that i may want and may use the browser so i can pay for them because they're not anywhere else or i have to cobble together some self-hosted stuff which is kind of cool if you're into that but if you're not then making that readily available to the masses for $10 a month or some fee may be kind of cool.

sustainably capitalistic and deploy features that are paid that i may want and may use the browser so i can pay for them because they're not anywhere else or i have to cobble together some self-hosted stuff which is kind of cool if you're into that but if you're not then making that readily available to the masses for $10 a month or some fee may be kind of cool.

I don't know what they're doing, but it's something like that. It's like ask on page, five-second previews, tidy up tab titles, tidy downloads. These are things that seem to be free. So I could be misspeaking about these being paid features.

I don't know what they're doing, but it's something like that. It's like ask on page, five-second previews, tidy up tab titles, tidy downloads. These are things that seem to be free. So I could be misspeaking about these being paid features.

Well, I think there's room for one because I speculated with Lady Bird that there could be some sort of subscription model to sustain it. There's definitely room for the browser caring more about security and privacy. And the incumbents, Chrome, Google has had a bad reputation for user privacy. Apple has been on the fence of privacy focused.

Well, I think there's room for one because I speculated with Lady Bird that there could be some sort of subscription model to sustain it. There's definitely room for the browser caring more about security and privacy. And the incumbents, Chrome, Google has had a bad reputation for user privacy. Apple has been on the fence of privacy focused.

But then they also have lots of things that are behind the scenes that get spoken about their practices that... that may be somewhat true or mostly true, and I still trust Apple. I'm not distrusting Apple.

But then they also have lots of things that are behind the scenes that get spoken about their practices that... that may be somewhat true or mostly true, and I still trust Apple. I'm not distrusting Apple.

What I'm trying to say is I think there's room for a browser to do stuff like this as a business model that isn't just here's a Firefox clone or a Chrome clone or a Safari clone and we're a new company, sustain us. where they can deliver more innovation.