Nick Wright

That's the first point.

The second and more important point, and by the time people hear this or if they watch this on YouTube after the fact, this might be dated, but I think it is absolutely on the board that the league retroactively give Wimby a flagrant foul.

Not a flagrant two.

but a flagrant one, which by the way, is what happened to Draymond in 2016.

Retroactively, he got a flagrant foul.

Now for Draymond, that was his fourth flagrant foul point, which triggered a suspension.

Wimby is sitting at two flagrant foul points because of the elbow to Nas Reed.

A retroactive after the game flagrant foul is meaningless, except for the fact it gives you one more flagrant foul point, which would mean if he were to pick up an additional flagrant in games four, five, or six, if it happened in game seven, it wouldn't matter.

He would miss the following game.

Now, here's why I think this is extra noteworthy.

You can, most players can basically guarantee they don't get a flagrant foul.

Except for on one type of play.

Closing out three-point shooters.

where landing zone penalties are flagrants.

Now, in this game, Wimby also had what is called in today's NBA a reckless closeout on Josh Hart.

Josh Hart didn't fall down.

Josh Hart made the three.

The refs missed it.

But that would have been a...

No question about it, flagrant foul, had the ref seen it.