Nicole Matusko
speaker
66 appearances
1 recordings
1 series
first heard May 2025
last heard May 2025
Nicole Matusko’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
So the initial 911 call was from Badura Eliasari, and she, during that 911 call, had told dispatchers that she walked into her home, she didn't know what had happened, that her husband was down.
So some of the first questions they had for the 911 caller was, how did this happen? What did you see? Did you hear anything?
So Holt is a residential area. It was a very quiet neighborhood. It was a dead-end street. If you were to drive by the homes, you could see kids playing outside. It's just your average neighborhood community. We do have pockets of high crime, but I wouldn't call Holt one of those pockets of crimes.
She was frantic. She ran up to the deputies, telling them that someone could still be in her house and that her husband was down. Her friend had come over to pick up her children.
When first responders came to that scene, I don't believe they knew what to really expect. And they definitely didn't expect what they saw inside the home. It was a pretty violent murder. So there was blood everywhere in the hallway where Ammar was located. And there was a single light on over where his body was bound.
All of the first responders, what they were unanimous about was when they walked into the house, they were hit with a wall of the scent of bleach, which was not common in what we expect to see in these types of cases.
Their initial goal was to clear the house to make sure no one else was present inside the house.
They weren't sure what type of instrument was used to kill Ammar. But what first responders had noticed is many of the wounds were actually in Ammar's head and neck area. So that was where the majority of the injury was.
When they actually got into the scene and started looking at it, there was evidence that the bleach had been poured on top of Ammar because he had dark clothing. And when bleach is poured, it creates the bleach pattern that many individuals are familiar with when they're doing their own laundry.
There was also evidence that the bleach had been poured on the walls and someone had tried to potentially wash down some of the blood spatter that was on the wall. They had found bleach at the scene, but they weren't able to determine if that was the bleach used to pour on top of Amar or on the walls of the location where he was killed.
So there was no sign of forced entry. The door didn't have damage to it. There was no signs that anyone had to break into the house. The house was also not ransacked. So everything appeared to be in the place where it was expected to be.
The manner of death was homicide and the cause of death was from chop wounds. So that would be different from, for example, a stabbing wound or something where a knife would have been stabbed into someone. And we know that it wasn't a gunshot wound because it didn't have the characteristics consistent with that.
So he had indicated that a chop wound would be consistent with an axe and the characteristics would be consistent with the front portion of that axe.
The children were with her when she arrived home. They were in the car. She couldn't get into the garage door. The garage door wasn't opening. So she went in through the front door and she actually left her two children in the car.
They asked normal questions. Did Amar have any enemies? Is there anybody you could have expected to do this? They're just trying to gather as much information as they possibly can to figure out who might be a suspect.
So this would have alerted anyone coming into the house that, you know, hey, this house is protected by an alarm. But also the alarm hadn't gone off. So for this to be a home invasion, there was no sign that someone broke in and the alarm company had notified law enforcement or done anything that indicated that the alarm was triggered.
And that's what they started with, is how was the marriage? How were things going? You know, was anybody involved in any extramarital affairs? She denied any of that.
Eventually, she did admit she had had an affair with someone, but she wouldn't provide any information. She wouldn't provide the name of that person or anything as it relates to who the person would be.
They reached out to the alarm company. They did search warrants to get records as to why it wasn't triggered or why it wasn't alerted if this was in fact someone that broke into the hole. They learned that the alarm had been turned off on the day of the homicide.
They were able to determine by further investigation that Badour was actually the individual who turned off that alarm system. I think that's when it started to raise a red flag that this may be an inside job.
Showing 1–20 of 66 · page 1 of 4
Next →