Norman Finkelstein

You agreed that I have condemned Israeli attacks on civilians. Yes, there are. I never quarrel with facts. Your description of the 1982 war is so shocking, it makes my innards writhe. And then your description of the Second Intifada? Your description of defensive shield? They are worse than apologetics. That's like the Stalinist rule of falsification.

Do you remember that?

Do you remember that?

Do you remember that?

I am completely aware of that. But if you forgot the numbers, it was three to one. They killed mostly armed Palestinian government. That's what you say in your book, but that's not what Amnesty International said. That's not what Human Rights Watch said. I don't remember what they said. I do. I don't know whether their figures are right. My figures are right.

I am completely aware of that. But if you forgot the numbers, it was three to one. They killed mostly armed Palestinian government. That's what you say in your book, but that's not what Amnesty International said. That's not what Human Rights Watch said. I don't remember what they said. I do. I don't know whether their figures are right. My figures are right.

I am completely aware of that. But if you forgot the numbers, it was three to one. They killed mostly armed Palestinian government. That's what you say in your book, but that's not what Amnesty International said. That's not what Human Rights Watch said. I don't remember what they said. I do. I don't know whether their figures are right. My figures are right.

Professor Morris, fantasy, but I'm not going to argue with here. Here's a simple challenge. You said not to look at the camera. It scares the people. I'll make the open challenge. You are going to scare them. No. Professor Morris.

Professor Morris, fantasy, but I'm not going to argue with here. Here's a simple challenge. You said not to look at the camera. It scares the people. I'll make the open challenge. You are going to scare them. No. Professor Morris.

Professor Morris, fantasy, but I'm not going to argue with here. Here's a simple challenge. You said not to look at the camera. It scares the people. I'll make the open challenge. You are going to scare them. No. Professor Morris.

Words are in print. I wrote 50 pages analyzing all of your work. I quote, some will say cherry pick, but I think accurately quote you. Here's a simple challenge. Answer me in print. Answer what I wrote and show where I'm making things up. Answer me a print. I'm not familiar. I'm sorry. I'm not familiar with what you wrote. That's no problem. You're a busy man. You're an important historian.

Words are in print. I wrote 50 pages analyzing all of your work. I quote, some will say cherry pick, but I think accurately quote you. Here's a simple challenge. Answer me in print. Answer what I wrote and show where I'm making things up. Answer me a print. I'm not familiar. I'm sorry. I'm not familiar with what you wrote. That's no problem. You're a busy man. You're an important historian.

Words are in print. I wrote 50 pages analyzing all of your work. I quote, some will say cherry pick, but I think accurately quote you. Here's a simple challenge. Answer me in print. Answer what I wrote and show where I'm making things up. Answer me a print. I'm not familiar. I'm sorry. I'm not familiar with what you wrote. That's no problem. You're a busy man. You're an important historian.

You don't have to know everything that's in print, especially by modest publishers. But now you know. And so here's the public challenge. You answer and show where I cherry picked, where I misrepresented. Send me the article. And then we can have a civil scholarly discussion. I'm not sure we will agree.

You don't have to know everything that's in print, especially by modest publishers. But now you know. And so here's the public challenge. You answer and show where I cherry picked, where I misrepresented. Send me the article. And then we can have a civil scholarly discussion. I'm not sure we will agree.

You don't have to know everything that's in print, especially by modest publishers. But now you know. And so here's the public challenge. You answer and show where I cherry picked, where I misrepresented. Send me the article. And then we can have a civil scholarly discussion. I'm not sure we will agree.

It's for the reader. to decide, looking at both sides, where this truth stands.

It's for the reader. to decide, looking at both sides, where this truth stands.

It's for the reader. to decide, looking at both sides, where this truth stands.

No, there are two aspects. There's a public debate, but there's also... within words.