Nufar Gaspar

And with it, your OS compounds even further and forever.

All right, top of the stack and a great addition, not a mandatory one, is to add automations.

Those are things that the agents can run when you're not watching, whether it's a daily summary every morning at 7 a.m., a monitoring task that pings Slack or anything else that you can think of.

They are very powerful.

And of course, with OpenClaw, we also have heartbeat and cron jobs for the ones who are involved with that.

However, this is the layer that creates a lot of risk if you're not careful, because an agent that is running at 3 a.m.

with the wrong answer can do damage before you wake up.

So a few rules with regards to automations.

Only automate workflows you have run manually enough times and trust.

Second, I want you to start with automations that produce draft for you to review, not outputs that go directly to other people.

And lastly, always add logs.

You need to know what ran and what it did as it was running.

And finally, here's where the whole thing clicks.

Once you build your OS, agents become cheap because your first agent is hard as you're building the agent OS and the agent itself probably at the same time.

Your chief of staff maybe took you a weekend, but the second agent that is built on top of this system, maybe it's a research agent or a board prep agent, that takes you an afternoon because it inherits everything that is relevant and it already knows you and it knows your context, it knows your voice.

And you're only adding a job description and a few specific skills.

And from here on after, you're third, you're fifth, and so on, they are each becoming faster and faster.

So this is the compounding return and why I'm so bullish on the agentic operating system.

And it matters more than the agents or the tools themselves.

So this is my system.