Oleksii Arestovych

If it's Trump, he works with Trump. But he sincerely believes that a country has objective interests. independently from the last name of their leader, the size and the geographical location and real geopolitical interests. And he's always trying to appeal to that. So notice, his style is real politics.

If it's Trump, he works with Trump. But he sincerely believes that a country has objective interests. independently from the last name of their leader, the size and the geographical location and real geopolitical interests. And he's always trying to appeal to that. So notice, his style is real politics.

He's always talking about real politics, real interests, and he's offering to act within those parameters and framework on the television. What did he achieve in this war? He achieved a great success. You remember the debates of Kamala Harris and Trump? There was a very curious moment in there. President Trump says to Kamala that you failed in your negotiations, your talks with Russia.

He's always talking about real politics, real interests, and he's offering to act within those parameters and framework on the television. What did he achieve in this war? He achieved a great success. You remember the debates of Kamala Harris and Trump? There was a very curious moment in there. President Trump says to Kamala that you failed in your negotiations, your talks with Russia.

If it had been me, the war would not have started. It's a very free paraphrasing of what took place. So she's losing it for a second. And then she says, in a very free paraphrasing as well, she responds, why do we even have to speak to people like Putin and the rest of them? And that's the thing that Putin always feels, and it touches him very painfully.

If it had been me, the war would not have started. It's a very free paraphrasing of what took place. So she's losing it for a second. And then she says, in a very free paraphrasing as well, she responds, why do we even have to speak to people like Putin and the rest of them? And that's the thing that Putin always feels, and it touches him very painfully.

And he demands, he wants for others to speak to him on the same level, like equals. So his interview with Tucker is his attempt to prove why they need to talk to him as an equal. And he's talking about a multipolarized world, not just the United States who had usurped the power and were telling everybody else how to live. So in this war, he's posing as the representative of the Global South.

And he demands, he wants for others to speak to him on the same level, like equals. So his interview with Tucker is his attempt to prove why they need to talk to him as an equal. And he's talking about a multipolarized world, not just the United States who had usurped the power and were telling everybody else how to live. So in this war, he's posing as the representative of the Global South.

He tried to put China India and BRICS and the Arab world on his side. So he's showing them like I'm the person who is capable to stand against the West, this new colonialism that they're promoting. So he's discussing those terms. For you, I'm the defense against that. And the summit in Kazan, when his political isolation was torn apart and tens of world leaders joined him.

He tried to put China India and BRICS and the Arab world on his side. So he's showing them like I'm the person who is capable to stand against the West, this new colonialism that they're promoting. So he's discussing those terms. For you, I'm the defense against that. And the summit in Kazan, when his political isolation was torn apart and tens of world leaders joined him.

So that's the culmination of this war of 2022. He It's showing that I managed to be this ram from the global south and to force the West to face this new political reality where the world is not single polar anymore. And that it doesn't matter who the president of the U.S. is, even though things change after Trump.

So that's the culmination of this war of 2022. He It's showing that I managed to be this ram from the global south and to force the West to face this new political reality where the world is not single polar anymore. And that it doesn't matter who the president of the U.S. is, even though things change after Trump.

From his point of view, the West looks like people that promise for the period, leaders who promise for the period of time while they're in power. So if it's four years, to put it this way, roughly, he's in power, he can promise for four years.

From his point of view, the West looks like people that promise for the period, leaders who promise for the period of time while they're in power. So if it's four years, to put it this way, roughly, he's in power, he can promise for four years.

And then every time you need to deal with new people, many times imposing positions because the opposition comes to power and he needs to renegotiate from zero every time, every time having those problems. And I think he tried to resolve the problem on a key level. He showed that In order to defend Russian interests, he's ready to use military force, and you can't not consider that.

And then every time you need to deal with new people, many times imposing positions because the opposition comes to power and he needs to renegotiate from zero every time, every time having those problems. And I think he tried to resolve the problem on a key level. He showed that In order to defend Russian interests, he's ready to use military force, and you can't not consider that.

Other than that, in his eyes, Potsdam's system was destroyed, which had been created after the Second World War, and now we need to build a new collective security system in Europe or the whole world. This is one of the key things. He mentions one of the key things that I myself talk about, but in his opinion, the West does not want to pose the question this way.

Other than that, in his eyes, Potsdam's system was destroyed, which had been created after the Second World War, and now we need to build a new collective security system in Europe or the whole world. This is one of the key things. He mentions one of the key things that I myself talk about, but in his opinion, the West does not want to pose the question this way.

So he said today that the West is playing one-sidedly. to oppress. I'm offering a collective system of security, but you are oppressing us. You don't want to consider us. This is not equal relationships. We're not par.

So he said today that the West is playing one-sidedly. to oppress. I'm offering a collective system of security, but you are oppressing us. You don't want to consider us. This is not equal relationships. We're not par.