Pam Bondi (hearing) / Stephen Miller / Trump aides (multiple clips) - see context -> Pam Bondi & Stephen Miller (primarily Pam Bondi in hearing segments)

You know, I mean, we have the same conflict.

So there isn't it's it's something that will get worked out.

Organ legal insurrection.

Does the administration still plan to abide by that ruling?

Well, the administration filed an appeal this morning with the Ninth Circuit.

I would note the administration won an identical case in the Ninth Circuit just a few months ago with respect to the federalizing of the California National Guard.

Under Title 10 of the U.S.

Code, the president has plenary authority.

It seemed, Stephen, I apologize.

It seems like we're having a technical organ.

You call the legal ruling legal insurrection.

Are you recommending the president take action against judges with rulings of disagreement?

No, it's simply a factually accurate statement that when a judge assumes for him or herself the powers that have been relegated or delegated by the Constitution to the president, that that is a form of a legal insurrection.

And we have seen... Insurrection carries a legal weight, so are you recommending... No, we have seen over the last nine months

a ongoing legal insurrection in which district court judges, as a class in many cases, have issued, which is why they've been overturned so much, have issued rulings that are flagrantly unlawful and unconstitutional.

And it is an insurrection against the laws and constitution of the United States.

And we need to have district courts in this country that see themselves as being under the laws and constitution and not being able to take for themselves powers that are reserved solely for the president.

One more question.

He says that you're attempting to inflame tensions and create a war zone.

He also says that you are profiling, that you're targeting black and brown people, even those who turn out to be here legally.