Pat (guest/co-host)

They just wanted to get some lulls.

Like, do you think that that would be excusable at all?

Because to me, I think that would still be very much across the line.

And no, you got to fire them in a congressional office.

Yeah, absolutely.

I mean, it would make it a little bit better, but it still wouldn't excuse the activity.

And I also think that there are many young Republicans in particular who do these types of things and they act as if, oh, no, I was just joking.

I was just joking.

But sometimes if you look underneath it all, they actually do believe in these things.

They're trying to hide behind the possibility that maybe it was a joke.

But if you peel through the layers a little bit, you find out actually, no, this is what they believe.

Yeah, I mean, I could imagine a scenario where someone who's here on a visa says something that wouldn't violate the law that would fall under free speech, but that the government took issue with and decided to revoke their visa over.

Like I can imagine such a scenario.

But when you take a look at these comments, the one that you read.

that Charlie Kirk was spreading racist, xenophobic, misogynist rhetoric.

How could you possibly say that that's worthy of a visa over?

There's another comment here.

Someone wrote in German when fascists die, Democrats don't complain.

So they could argue that like that's rationalizing his death or celebrating his death.

But I think even that's a stretch to say that someone should lose their visa status over something like that.