Patrick Broe

Competition Court, yes.

Well, they said they put an injunction on the test.

They said the test can't proceed and the test was not allowed to take place in China.

Don't know.

I think this goes beyond the gear testing.

It's about the precedent that if, yeah, I think the UCI being able to conduct tests, I think that's why I assume they're taking it to a further court, but

Well, that's a change, right?

That rule is like... It doesn't... The rule doesn't... Of the big manufacturers, the computer rule does not single one out, right?

That has a product being used in the Peloton.

And then it's like, okay, the rule was made.

It didn't impinge upon anyone in particular, but then you're forewarned.

And then if you choose to make a bike computer that doesn't comply with the rules, it's like there's not a competition issue like there was with the SRAM gearing with the proposed test.

So we'll see the result of that.

We'll keep you updated.

I assume it'll take quite a while.

I don't know how prompt the Belgian Court of Cassation does things, but... Hoff on Cassassie.

Is that what it's called?

What does that actually mean?

What's the English translation of that?

Okay.