Patrick Coffey

It's also in keeping with Meta's new argument that Adam Mosseri has made that it's not a social networking business, it's an entertainment business.

How pervasive is that thinking internally?

Is that where Meta wants Reels to go from here?

That was journal reporter Megan Bobrowski.

Which video app are you scrolling through these days?

If you're a listener on Spotify, let us know in the comments.

Coming up, judges are increasingly using AI to help decide legal disputes.

How the new tech is working in the courtroom.

That's after the break.

You might think that the court of law would be one of the last places to experience AI creep.

Not so.

Recently, we've seen headline-making scandals about lawyers using AI-generated briefs citing fictional cases.

Some judges have banned them from using AI in their courtrooms or sanctioned attorneys for submitting inaccurate AI-generated information.

But even so, WSJ reporter Erin Mulvaney tells us a growing number of judges are embracing the technology themselves.

So Erin, can you give us a sense from your reporting of how judges are currently using AI?

So they say that they're using it for back office or routine work rather than influencing their decisions.

That's a very familiar argument when it comes to AI across industries.

You know, they're saying that we're just getting rid of the rote stuff that takes too much time.

But in the case of the court system, it feels like that could be a very blurry line.

I mean, how do we say when the tools are starting to influence their decisions in some way?