Paul Conti

And we don't think about what does that mean?

I actually think of it kind of the other way.

I don't think there's any purpose to purposelessness, right?

So why would anything be here if the drive weren't towards...

creativity, right?

If it drives warrant towards those subatomic particles not being nothingness that blips in and out of existence, right?

Like we think is going on in empty space, you know, for light years upon light years, right?

But is there a design, either natural or intentional, for a schema, right?

A scenario that allows for the incredibly rare but not non-existent eddy pool of counterentropy where

Good can happen, right?

Where creativity can happen, where ultimately something can grow, something novel can happen.

There's no novelty in the vastness of space, even though there's not nothing there.

There's novelty here because I think the layers of emergence start stacking very, very, very high when we're in a place of counterentropy.

which then could provide even thoughts about like good and evil, right?

The idea that creating, that preserving is good, right?

It's what we build upon.

It's how we get to the eddy pool of counter entropy, right?

So then destruction is not good.

What good comes of aggression and destruction?

unless we're protecting.