Paul Saladino

And at the top of my X is a thread pinned where I go through all 11 randomized control trials on CETOLs and I break every single one of them down and I show people how badly these trials have been done. And the only way

And at the top of my X is a thread pinned where I go through all 11 randomized control trials on CETOLs and I break every single one of them down and I show people how badly these trials have been done. And the only way

And at the top of my X is a thread pinned where I go through all 11 randomized control trials on CETOLs and I break every single one of them down and I show people how badly these trials have been done. And the only way

that I think anyone could come to the conclusion that seed oils, that there's no evidence they're harmful for humans, is to not have read those trials and to not understand how flawed they are.

that I think anyone could come to the conclusion that seed oils, that there's no evidence they're harmful for humans, is to not have read those trials and to not understand how flawed they are.

that I think anyone could come to the conclusion that seed oils, that there's no evidence they're harmful for humans, is to not have read those trials and to not understand how flawed they are.

Because there are many trials, the Sydney Diet Heart Study, the Minnesota Coronary Study, the Rose Coronary Trial, which all show that seed oils increase the risk of heart disease relative to saturated fats from animals. The problem is that

Because there are many trials, the Sydney Diet Heart Study, the Minnesota Coronary Study, the Rose Coronary Trial, which all show that seed oils increase the risk of heart disease relative to saturated fats from animals. The problem is that

Because there are many trials, the Sydney Diet Heart Study, the Minnesota Coronary Study, the Rose Coronary Trial, which all show that seed oils increase the risk of heart disease relative to saturated fats from animals. The problem is that

There are many other trials that get thrown into a meta-analysis, and then Darius Mazzafarian or Hamley has a forest plot, and they're using faulty trials in their meta-analysis. And so that's really the conversation that I think needs to be had, that anyone who thinks that seed oils are benign needs to take another look at the studies and realize the studies that you are citing are badly flawed.

There are many other trials that get thrown into a meta-analysis, and then Darius Mazzafarian or Hamley has a forest plot, and they're using faulty trials in their meta-analysis. And so that's really the conversation that I think needs to be had, that anyone who thinks that seed oils are benign needs to take another look at the studies and realize the studies that you are citing are badly flawed.

There are many other trials that get thrown into a meta-analysis, and then Darius Mazzafarian or Hamley has a forest plot, and they're using faulty trials in their meta-analysis. And so that's really the conversation that I think needs to be had, that anyone who thinks that seed oils are benign needs to take another look at the studies and realize the studies that you are citing are badly flawed.

And I think that the best trials with seed oils versus saturated fat clearly show they're harmful. And to be frank, we need another trial. We need a trial that's done in 2025. We need a trial that shows, that answers this question now because we cannot fully rely because doctors are not reading the studies because they're coming to conclusions like that.

And I think that the best trials with seed oils versus saturated fat clearly show they're harmful. And to be frank, we need another trial. We need a trial that's done in 2025. We need a trial that shows, that answers this question now because we cannot fully rely because doctors are not reading the studies because they're coming to conclusions like that.

And I think that the best trials with seed oils versus saturated fat clearly show they're harmful. And to be frank, we need another trial. We need a trial that's done in 2025. We need a trial that shows, that answers this question now because we cannot fully rely because doctors are not reading the studies because they're coming to conclusions like that.

I appreciate Gabrielle, I respect your opinion, and I disagree with that very strongly if you actually read the trial. So that's important because there are many very intelligent, well-intentioned people. I shouldn't say many. There are a few intelligent, well-intentioned people out there saying that there's no evidence COs are harmful. And like, man, put me in the ring.

I appreciate Gabrielle, I respect your opinion, and I disagree with that very strongly if you actually read the trial. So that's important because there are many very intelligent, well-intentioned people. I shouldn't say many. There are a few intelligent, well-intentioned people out there saying that there's no evidence COs are harmful. And like, man, put me in the ring.

I appreciate Gabrielle, I respect your opinion, and I disagree with that very strongly if you actually read the trial. So that's important because there are many very intelligent, well-intentioned people. I shouldn't say many. There are a few intelligent, well-intentioned people out there saying that there's no evidence COs are harmful. And like, man, put me in the ring.

Let's go.

Let's go.