Payton Moreland
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Later, Hollander would argue that Alina falsely accused him of abuse, just so she could stay in the States under the Violence Against Women Act, which does offer those sorts of protections and can help survivors petition for immigration status. Here's the thing, though. People who knew Hollander... believed Alina.
Later, Hollander would argue that Alina falsely accused him of abuse, just so she could stay in the States under the Violence Against Women Act, which does offer those sorts of protections and can help survivors petition for immigration status. Here's the thing, though. People who knew Hollander... believed Alina.
Later, Hollander would argue that Alina falsely accused him of abuse, just so she could stay in the States under the Violence Against Women Act, which does offer those sorts of protections and can help survivors petition for immigration status. Here's the thing, though. People who knew Hollander... believed Alina.
Because Hollander always had this sort of lack of respect or honestly rather total disdain for women. He was openly anti-feminist and he used his skills as a lawyer to argue a lot of things that he felt were inherently favorable towards women.
Because Hollander always had this sort of lack of respect or honestly rather total disdain for women. He was openly anti-feminist and he used his skills as a lawyer to argue a lot of things that he felt were inherently favorable towards women.
Because Hollander always had this sort of lack of respect or honestly rather total disdain for women. He was openly anti-feminist and he used his skills as a lawyer to argue a lot of things that he felt were inherently favorable towards women.
But as a fellow lawyer, Nicholas Mundy told the Post, quote, In my opinion, he was already a controlling, misogynistic, sexist, delusional and disturbed individual before his marriage failed. So this is just the type of person people around him think. And then in the 2000s, friends noticed that Hollander was starting to call women by a new name.
But as a fellow lawyer, Nicholas Mundy told the Post, quote, In my opinion, he was already a controlling, misogynistic, sexist, delusional and disturbed individual before his marriage failed. So this is just the type of person people around him think. And then in the 2000s, friends noticed that Hollander was starting to call women by a new name.
But as a fellow lawyer, Nicholas Mundy told the Post, quote, In my opinion, he was already a controlling, misogynistic, sexist, delusional and disturbed individual before his marriage failed. So this is just the type of person people around him think. And then in the 2000s, friends noticed that Hollander was starting to call women by a new name.
So instead of calling them women, he started calling them feminazis.
So instead of calling them women, he started calling them feminazis.
So instead of calling them women, he started calling them feminazis.
So the angry anti-feminist remarks got less subtle, more consistent from there, which would make sense considering some of the cases he started taking on at this point in his career. Like this one. In 2008, he sued Columbia University for providing women's studies classes. He claimed it was bigotry against men. And he won that lawsuit, by the way.
So the angry anti-feminist remarks got less subtle, more consistent from there, which would make sense considering some of the cases he started taking on at this point in his career. Like this one. In 2008, he sued Columbia University for providing women's studies classes. He claimed it was bigotry against men. And he won that lawsuit, by the way.
So the angry anti-feminist remarks got less subtle, more consistent from there, which would make sense considering some of the cases he started taking on at this point in his career. Like this one. In 2008, he sued Columbia University for providing women's studies classes. He claimed it was bigotry against men. And he won that lawsuit, by the way.
Yes. He also filed a handful of lawsuits against bars for having ladies' nights. He said they violated the 14th Amendment that says everyone should have equal protection.
Yes. He also filed a handful of lawsuits against bars for having ladies' nights. He said they violated the 14th Amendment that says everyone should have equal protection.
Yes. He also filed a handful of lawsuits against bars for having ladies' nights. He said they violated the 14th Amendment that says everyone should have equal protection.
He's basically saying the fact that you're giving women a discount to get into the bar and not men is prejudicial. So it was sort of trivial nonsense that Roy Den Hollander was wasting his law degree fighting for. But in Hollander's eyes, his fight against women seemed to be a cause worth dying for. And this all appeared to stem back to his mother.
He's basically saying the fact that you're giving women a discount to get into the bar and not men is prejudicial. So it was sort of trivial nonsense that Roy Den Hollander was wasting his law degree fighting for. But in Hollander's eyes, his fight against women seemed to be a cause worth dying for. And this all appeared to stem back to his mother.